-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Improve alphabetical ordering for non-version entries #19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e28beff
Improve test code consistency
JamesMGreene cab24dd
Add tests for sorting version numbers with v/V prefixes
JamesMGreene 8d253ca
Add test for sorting non-version data with trailing numbers alphabeti…
JamesMGreene adba5ad
Update test for sorting non-version data to a more alphabetically-inc…
JamesMGreene 6840114
Add test for yui style tags to match benchmark fixtures
JamesMGreene 27ec38a
Update parse_version_number to short-circuit on non-versions
JamesMGreene eaa0275
Add a test to verify the README example
JamesMGreene 718e23b
Slight ordering expectation adjustment to tests
JamesMGreene b5babff
Handle special case for zero recognized chunks with alphabetical sorting
JamesMGreene 269b7b6
Undo short-circuiting code in parse_version_number
JamesMGreene b214d73
Adjust string chunk building logic to include as many hyphenated port…
JamesMGreene 3c8b797
Reduce size comparisons from 2 to 1
JamesMGreene d63ec17
Revert stylistic changes to test code
JamesMGreene 489a1a1
Add comments explaining test intent
JamesMGreene File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fact that sorting is wildly different here after this change worries me a lot. Was the goal of the PR to refine how these are sorted? If not, would it be possible to only scope the changes in this PR to achieve the desired sorting of specific cases but leave all other behaviors intact?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the trouble of the current sorting mechanism for non-versions can be summed up as:
This is why I added the
strcmpusage specifically for comparisons with 0 comparison chunks, which will make sorting for those special cases deterministic.Here's a second PR with a new test (which will fail) demonstrating the issue: #20
P.S. To be clear: there is still opportunity for other special cases that mix alphanumerics and non-alphanumerics to end up sorted non-deterministically. 😬