Include Resource Group definition as part of route struct

[Prabhjot-Sethi]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added support for assigning a group to routes, enabling clearer organization and segmentation where grouping is displayed.
  • The group attribute is optional and only appears when provided, preserving existing behavior for all other routes.
  • Existing routes require no changes; displays remain unchanged unless a group is set.
  • Enhances compatibility with clients that surface route grouping for categorization or filtering.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A new exported field, Group string, was added to the Route struct in route/route.go with BSON tag bson:"group,omitempty". No other files or logic were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Route struct update route/route.go	Added exported field Group string with tag bson:"group,omitempty" to Route struct after IsUserSpecific. No behavioral changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers at a tidy tweak,
A Group now hops with Route we seek.
BSON burrows, fields align,
Carrots count in schema fine.
Small nibble change, a gentle hop—
Onward through the docs we pop! 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly indicates that a Resource Group field is being added to the Route struct, which directly reflects the only change in this PR. It's clear, specific, and focused on the primary modification without extraneous details.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch resource-group

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24ef7e7 and 7003b74.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• route/route.go (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

route/route.go (1)

47-47: Add handling for the new Group field
No instantiations or accesses of .Group were found—update constructors (e.g. NewRoute) and callers to set and use this field, and consider adding an inline comment to clarify its RBAC role.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}