-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Tool Improvement: Audit functions for implementation vs. training alignment #17552
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Closed
Copy link
Labels
area/agentIssues related to Core Agent, Tools, Memory, Sub-Agents, Hooks, Agent QualityIssues related to Core Agent, Tools, Memory, Sub-Agents, Hooks, Agent Qualitystatus/need-triageIssues that need to be triaged by the triage automation.Issues that need to be triaged by the triage automation.workstream-rollupLabel used to tag epics and features that are associated with one of the three primary workstreamsLabel used to tag epics and features that are associated with one of the three primary workstreams🔒 maintainer only⛔ Do not contribute. Internal roadmap item.⛔ Do not contribute. Internal roadmap item.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
area/agentIssues related to Core Agent, Tools, Memory, Sub-Agents, Hooks, Agent QualityIssues related to Core Agent, Tools, Memory, Sub-Agents, Hooks, Agent Qualitystatus/need-triageIssues that need to be triaged by the triage automation.Issues that need to be triaged by the triage automation.workstream-rollupLabel used to tag epics and features that are associated with one of the three primary workstreamsLabel used to tag epics and features that are associated with one of the three primary workstreams🔒 maintainer only⛔ Do not contribute. Internal roadmap item.⛔ Do not contribute. Internal roadmap item.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for Task.
Audit core functions to ensure implementation aligns with current model training expectations (especially regarding Bash usage). It entails broadly checking that our tools/functions have similar names and params as the training tools.
Link to parent: #15331.