fix(core): ensure enter_plan_mode tool registration respects experimental.plan#18587
fix(core): ensure enter_plan_mode tool registration respects experimental.plan#18587
enter_plan_mode tool registration respects experimental.plan#18587Conversation
…ntal.plan The enter_plan_mode tool was being registered unconditionally when not in plan mode. This change updates syncPlanModeTools to only register the tool if experimental.plan is enabled. Added regression tests to verify that the tool is correctly registered or unregistered based on the experimental.plan setting. Follow up to #18352 Related to #18334
|
Hi @jerop, thank you so much for your contribution to Gemini CLI! We really appreciate the time and effort you've put into this. We're making some updates to our contribution process to improve how we track and review changes. Please take a moment to review our recent discussion post: Improving Our Contribution Process & Introducing New Guidelines. Key Update: Starting January 26, 2026, the Gemini CLI project will require all pull requests to be associated with an existing issue. Any pull requests not linked to an issue by that date will be automatically closed. Thank you for your understanding and for being a part of our community! |
Summary of ChangesHello @jerop, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves an issue where the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Size Change: +214 B (0%) Total Size: 23.9 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses the issue where the enter_plan_mode tool was registered unconditionally. The changes in syncPlanModeTools now ensure that the tool is only registered if the experimental.plan feature is enabled, and also correctly unregisters it if the feature is disabled. The addition of regression tests to cover both scenarios is excellent and ensures the fix is robust. The code is clean and the logic is sound. Great work!
The
enter_plan_modetool was being registered unconditionally when not in plan mode. This change updatessyncPlanModeToolsto only register the tool ifexperimental.planis enabled. Follow up to #18352 wheresyncPlanModeToolswas introduced. Added regression tests to verify that the tool is correctly registered or unregistered based on theexperimental.plansetting.Related to #18334.