Skip to content

Conversation

@mjvogelsong
Copy link
Contributor

@mjvogelsong mjvogelsong commented Apr 14, 2023

Our tests have been failing because get_detector_by_name() was doing the name-filtering on the client side. This change moves the filter to the server side, so it's fast and simpler.

@mjvogelsong mjvogelsong requested a review from robotrapta April 14, 2023 17:45
@mjvogelsong mjvogelsong changed the title Improve get_detector_by_name Fix tests (improve get_detector_by_name()) Apr 14, 2023
@mjvogelsong mjvogelsong mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@tyler-romero tyler-romero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@mjvogelsong mjvogelsong merged commit 36f8cd1 into main Apr 14, 2023
@mjvogelsong mjvogelsong deleted the fix-get-detector-by-name branch April 14, 2023 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants