Edit content field and remove type field from job.yml

[MattPereira]

Fixes #2845

What changes did you make and why did you make them ?

• Changed content field key: value pair in _data/internal/credits/job.yml
• Removed type field from _data/internal/credits/job.yml

These changes were made to reduce redundancy in the code.

Screenshots of Proposed Changes Of The Website

Updating content field and type field of job.yml file. No visual changes to the website.

[github-actions]

Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide!

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.

git checkout -b MattPereira-edit-remove-field-2845 gh-pages
git pull https://github.com/MattPereira/website.git edit-remove-field-2845

[blulady]

Hey Matt,
So again I appreciate your voracity but volunteers assign themselves to review PR's. Since this is a good first PR, it would be better if other new devs got a chance to review it. Normally I would recommend reviewing other dev's pr. Right now we don't have much but as other folks make their first pr, you'll have a ton to review.

[GRISONRF]

ETA: 10/12/2022
Availability: 35min

[GRISONRF]

The changes were made in the correct branch and everything looks good.

Edit: I just noticed it some checks were not successful and I'm not sure why.
It got an error parsing the pull request body for all the linked issues, but I don't know if it's related to Matt's code, since everything looks right.

[giroz]

ETA: 10/13/22
Availability: 2 hours

[arpitapandya]

The changes were made in the correct branch and everything looks good.

Edit: I just noticed it some checks were not successful and I'm not sure why. It got an error parsing the pull request body for all the linked issues, but I don't know if it's related to Matt's code, since everything looks right.

Answer on why some checks fail: We have GitHub actions that check for linked issue when we create a pull request. I see that @MattPereira mistakenly typed Fixes #3615 while creating a pull request to link the issue so checks didn't pass and that failed to generate PR labels automatically. but, later on, the correct issue is linked.

[gstemmann]

Review ETA: 6 PM 10/15/22
Availability: 6 hours

[gstemmann]

Everything looks good to me. And the correct repositories were chosen.

[blulady]

This branch is coming from the correct branch and going into gh-pages. There is a linked issue, it is correct and addressed in the PR by changing line four to content-type: image and deleting line 11. The code looks clean and there is only one file changed.
Good job!!

[giroz]

Good job. line 4 added text, and line 11 deleted text