Add GitHub handle 100automations kim audrey 5508

[tonyvang]

Fixes #5508

What changes did you make?

• In 100 Automations project page, added new variable github-handle below -name: Audrey Kim, w/o assignment, nested like other variables assoc. w/Kim eg role.

Why did you make the changes (we will use this info to test)?

• To hold the github handle for this member o/100 Automations leadership team
• To prepare for the eventual replacement of the github and picture variables
• In re: issue 5508

Screenshots of Proposed Changes Of The Website (if any, please do not screen shot code changes)

Added variable without assignment; no visual changes to the website.

[github-actions]

Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide!

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.

git checkout -b tonyvang-add-github-handle-100automations-kim-audrey-5508 gh-pages
git pull https://github.com/tonyvang/website.git add-github-handle-100automations-kim-audrey-5508

[ajb176]

Review ETA: 9/25 EOD
Availability: 5-9am

[ha-bach]

Reviewing this PR
ETA: should be end of week
Availability: weekends

[ajb176]

Nice catch that the original change disrupted the webpage, and nice work showing your blocker here. I'm seeing that issue as well, and I also see that the change you proposed doesn't cause any disruption.

I think the template for these issues may need to be slightly changed, I'll check on that quickly before approving/requesting changes. But you definitely haven't done anything wrong.

Nice work!

[roslynwythe]

@ajb176 @muninnhugin @tonyvang there is an error in this issue and it will be updated shortly. In the meantime do not review or merge. Thank you

[roslynwythe]

Thank you @tonyvang for excellent work on this issue. Your testing and analysis were 100% correct and your code change is correct and clean. You created a PR with correct branches and a useful description of your work. Thank you for your contribution to Hack for LA!

[tonyvang]

Thanks @ajb176 & @roslynwythe for the reviews; I wasn't sure about my changes at first, but I hope this helps other devs working on these refactoring issues.