Skip to content

tests for Mullapudi2016 and Li2018 aren't very good #7063

@steven-johnson

Description

@steven-johnson

The existing tests for the Mullapudi2016 and Li2018 autoschedulers aren't very useful: most of them basically just run and dump the schedule and loop nest to stdout (and maybe runtimes too), but don't attempt to validate them. Thus, they mostly amount to "can we produce a schedule without crashing and will it run in a non-crazy amount of time". This is better than nothing, I guess, but we can do better.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions