Skip to content

Changes to 'tags' etc.. #16

@andrewwatson

Description

@andrewwatson

How open are you guys to thinking about alternate tagging for service nodes?

For my purposes, I'd really like to be able to tag a node as running both a macro version of a service (Authentication v2.0 for example) and also possibly versions of specific messages (whether it's REST HTTP JSON or protocol buffers or amqp envelope bodies...) and then be able to resolve something like this by having some things have default values...

client_grant.v1.authentication.v2.us-west-1a.consul 
client_grant.authentication.us-west-1a.consul
authentication.consul

and being able to publish serf tags as appropriate to create these records.

what do you think?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions