[Manual backport] Net 3478/backport service instances table#16841
Merged
JadhavPoonam merged 1 commit intoApr 3, 2023
Conversation
…illable service instances
JadhavPoonam
force-pushed
the
NET-3478/backport-service-instances-table
branch
from
d78a08e to
4ef6d64
Compare
JadhavPoonam
changed the title
ishustava
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The backport label on
1.14PR did not generate a backport PR here so I have to create this manually.Also, some of the changes were not easily back portable:
ServiceUsagemethod instate->usage.gofunction does not takememdb.WatchSetparameterfirstUsageEntryfunction also does not takememdb.WatchSetparamxdscapacitydirectory does not exist in1.13.xTesting & Reproduction steps
Links
Cherry-picked commit from release 1.14.x: #16819
PR Checklist
updated test coverageexternal facing docs updatednot a security concern