Allow configurable egress for server network policy#389
Merged
jasonodonnell merged 6 commits intoDec 16, 2020
Conversation
Contributor
|
@corest Thanks for the contribution! This use case makes sense but I wonder if we need to allow users to pass in whatever configurations they want for their egress. Using this design an operator can add whatever Thoughts? |
Contributor
Author
|
@jasonodonnell agree |
jasonodonnell
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2020
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are specific cases when the server pod needs to communicate with some external components.
E.g. when using various auth backends: