CI: add GHC 9.10 (backport #9914) #10058

mergify · 2024-05-29T01:07:40Z

Please read Github PR Conventions and then fill in one of these two templates.

Template Β: This PR does not modify cabal behaviour (documentation, tests, refactoring, etc.)

Include the following checklist in your PR:

Patches conform to the coding conventions.
Is this a PR that fixes CI? If so, it will need to be backported to older cabal release branches (ask maintainers for directions).

This is an automatic backport of pull request #9914 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Mikolaj · 2024-05-29T14:36:48Z

Two dots vs three dots strikes again. I remember we fixed it, but I don't remember on which branch and if PR commit that contained it (might have been a big PR about something else) got backported:

-Preprocessing library for plain-0.1.0.0..
+Preprocessing library for plain-0.1.0.0...

Would somebody try to find this?

ulysses4ever · 2024-05-29T14:47:15Z

there was a really old PR (last summer) to that effect:

Fix #8928 Conclude setup messages with an ellipsis #8929

I think this may be the effect of combing this one and #9671 (use in-tree Cabal library for cabal-install tests with custom setup) but since both are supposedly on the 3.12 branch, I don't understand why this failure doesn't happen on master... In particular, if #9617 is not in effect I can see how 9.10, the first GHC to ship Cabal with #8929, would fail. But presumably, #9617 is in effect both on master and on 3.12.

And there's another failure, which seems to be somewhat unrelated but also exhibiting some other deviation from the reference output:

2024-05-29T01:33:16.0599010Z --- /tmp/cabal-testsuite-191784/cabal.dist/cabal.out.normalized	2024-05-29 01:33:15.981884963 +0000
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0600652Z +++ /tmp/cabal-testsuite-191784/cabal.dist/cabal.comp.out.normalized	2024-05-29 01:33:15.981884963 +0000
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0601732Z @@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0602180Z  In order, the following will be built:
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0602867Z   - plain-0.1.0.0 *test (first run)
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0603497Z  Configuring plain-0.1.0.0...
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0604131Z -Preprocessing library for plain-0.1.0.0..
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0604834Z -Building library for plain-0.1.0.0..
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0605587Z -Preprocessing test suite 'test' for plain-0.1.0.0..
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0606433Z -Building test suite 'test' for plain-0.1.0.0..
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0606999Z +Preprocessing library for plain-0.1.0.0...
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0607583Z +Building library for plain-0.1.0.0...
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0608559Z +Preprocessing test suite 'test' for plain-0.1.0.0...
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0609449Z +Building test suite 'test' for plain-0.1.0.0...
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0610320Z  Running 1 test suites...
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0610807Z  Test suite test: RUNNING...
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0611295Z  Test suite test: PASS
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0612083Z  Test suite logged to: <ROOT>/cabal.dist/work/./dist/build/<ARCH>/ghc-<GHCVER>/plain-0.1.0.0/test/plain-0.1.0.0-test.log
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0613769Z -Test coverage report written to <ROOT>/cabal.dist/work/./dist/build/<ARCH>/ghc-<GHCVER>/plain-0.1.0.0/hpc/vanilla/html/test/hpc_index.html
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0615330Z +Package coverage report written to <ROOT>/cabal.dist/work/./dist/build/<ARCH>/ghc-<GHCVER>/plain-0.1.0.0/hpc/vanilla/html/hpc_index.html
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0616189Z  1 of 1 test suites (1 of 1 test cases) passed.
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0617294Z -Package coverage report written to <ROOT>/cabal.dist/work/./dist/build/<ARCH>/ghc-<GHCVER>/plain-0.1.0.0/hpc/vanilla/html/plain-0.1.0.0/hpc_index.html
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0619936Z +Package coverage report written to <ROOT>/cabal.dist/work/./dist/build/<ARCH>/ghc-<GHCVER>/plain-0.1.0.0/hpc/vanilla/html/hpc_index.html
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0621567Z *** Exception: ExitFailure 1
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0622018Z 
2024-05-29T01:33:16.0622565Z *** unexpected failure for PackageTests/CustomTestCoverage/cabal.test.hs

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T02:27:23Z

5c6f6700d686fb6c27f3210579440707f7d38cb5 is the first bad commit
commit 5c6f6700d686fb6c27f3210579440707f7d38cb5
Author: Artem Pelenitsyn <a.pelenitsyn@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue May 28 21:05:56 2024 -0400

    CI: add GHC 9.10 (#9914)
    
    * CI: add GHC 9.10
    
    * GHC 9.10 compat in testsuite: CPP symbols don't get passed to CC as
    eagearly
    
    Discussion: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/pull/9914#issuecomment-2077439625
    
    Related GHC issue: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/21291
    
    * GHC 9.10 compat in tests: disable tests regressing due to #9940
    
    (cherry picked from commit 3a8c69cb142e27caae5d754ac400636b3417b198)

wat 😖

ETA: nemmind, the test actually passes here, git bisect reported it because I told it it was a bad commit. So the question becomes, why does it fail on CI?

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T19:49:52Z

Now I'm stuck on

Resolving dependencies...
Error: [Cabal-7107]
Could not resolve dependencies:
[__0] trying: cabal-testsuite-3 (user goal)
[__1] next goal: cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal (dependency of cabal-testsuite)
[__1] rejecting: cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal-3.12.0.0 (conflict: cabal-testsuite => cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal>=3.10 && <3.11)
[__1] rejecting: cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal; 3.10.3.0, 3.10.2.1, 3.10.2.0, 3.10.1.0, 3.8.1.0, 3.6.3.0, 3.6.2.0, 3.6.1.0, 3.6.0.0, 3.4.1.0, 3.4.0.0, 3.2.1.0, 3.2.0.0, 3.0.2.0, 3.0.1.0, 3.0.0.0, 2.4.1.0, 2.4.0.1, 2.4.0.0, 2.2.0.1, 2.2.0.0, 2.0.1.1, 2.0.1.0, 2.0.0.2, 1.24.2.0, 1.24.0.0, 1.22.8.0, 1.22.7.0, 1.22.6.0, 1.22.5.0, 1.22.4.0, 1.22.3.0, 1.22.2.0, 1.22.1.1, 1.22.1.0, 1.22.0.0, 1.20.0.4, 1.20.0.3, 1.20.0.2, 1.20.0.1, 1.20.0.0, 1.18.1.7, 1.18.1.6, 1.18.1.5, 1.18.1.4, 1.18.1.3, 1.18.1.2, 1.18.1.1, 1.18.1, 1.18.0, 1.16.0.3, 1.16.0.2, 1.16.0.1, 1.16.0, 1.14.0, 1.12.0, 1.10.2.0, 1.10.1.0, 1.10.0.0, 1.8.0.6, 1.8.0.4, 1.8.0.2, 1.6.0.3, 1.6.0.2, 1.6.0.1, 1.4.0.2, 1.4.0.1, 1.4.0.0, 1.2.4.0, 1.2.3.0, 1.2.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.1.6, 1.24.1.0 (constraint from minimum version of Cabal used by Setup.hs requires >=3.12)
[__1] fail (backjumping, conflict set: cabal-testsuite, cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal)
After searching the rest of the dependency tree exhaustively, these were the goals I've had most trouble fulfilling: cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal, cabal-testsuite

Is this #9917?

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-01T20:06:25Z

I doubt it. More likely #8133 but also looks like you could bump the bound in cabal-testsuite.cabal for setup.Cabal?..

[__1] rejecting: cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal-3.12.0.0 (conflict: cabal-testsuite => cabal-testsuite:setup.Cabal>=3.10 && <3.11)

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T20:21:45Z

#8133 would be especially bad news since the next thing I do is build the test suite, so I can run the failing test.

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T21:16:32Z

Okay, got it. I hit this once before and forgot about it until I read the custom-setup stanza: I needed to use cabal-3.10.3.0.

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T21:31:11Z

Warning: Unknown/unsupported 'ghc' version detected (Cabal 3.10.3.0 supports
'ghc' version < 9.10): /home/allbery/.local/bin/ghc-9.10.1 is version 9.10.1
Resolving dependencies...
No Cabal library specified, using boot Cabal library with cabal-install tests
/home/allbery/.local/share/ghcup/ghc/9.10.1/bin/runghc-9.10.1 -- '--ghc-arg=-i' '--ghc-arg=-hide-all-packages' '--ghc-arg=-no-user-package-db' '--ghc-arg=-package-db' '--ghc-arg=/home/allbery/.local/state/cabal/store/ghc-9.10.1/package.db' '--ghc-arg=-package-db' '--ghc-arg=/home/allbery/Sources/cabal/dist-newstyle/packagedb/ghc-9.10.1' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=Cabal-3.12.0.0-inplace' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=Cabal-syntax-3.12.0.0-inplace' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=base-4.20.0.0-4014' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=bytestring-0.12.1.0-f8cd' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=cabal-testsuite-3-inplace' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=directory-1.3.8.3-07b9' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=exceptions-0.10.7-3f06' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=filepath-1.5.2.0-8683' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=process-1.6.19.0-20e6' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=time-1.12.2-ab16' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=transformers-0.6.1.1-6dc7' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=unix-2.8.5.1-e9c3' cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs --builddir /home/allbery/Sources/cabal/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.10.1/cabal-testsuite-3 cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs --with-cabal /home/allbery/Sources/cabal/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.6.4/cabal-install-3.11.0.0/x/cabal/build/cabal/cabal --with-ghc ghc-9.10.1
cabal.test.hs: VerboseException [("dieWithException",SrcLoc {srcLocPackage = "Cabal-3.12.0.0-inplace", srcLocModule = "Distribution.Simple.Program.Db", srcLocFile = "src/Distribution/Simple/Program/Db.hs", srcLocStartLine = 372, srcLocStartCol = 16, srcLocEndLine = 372, srcLocEndCol = 32})] 1717277042.117787565s (Verbosity {vLevel = Normal, vFlags = fromList [], vQuiet = False}) (ConfigureProgram "cabal" "/home/allbery/Sources/cabal/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.6.4/cabal-install-3.11.0.0/x/cabal/build/cabal/cabal")
HasCallStack backtrace:
  collectBacktraces, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/Exception.hs:92:13 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.Exception
  toExceptionWithBacktrace, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO.hs:260:11 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO
  throwIO, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:371:12 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at compiler/GHC/Driver/Monad.hs:167:54 in ghc-9.10.1-69c3:GHC.Driver.Monad
  a type signature in an instance, called at compiler/GHC/Driver/Monad.hs:167:54 in ghc-9.10.1-69c3:GHC.Driver.Monad
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at ghc/GHCi/UI/Monad.hs:288:15 in ghc-bin-9.10.1-33a2:GHCi.UI.Monad
  a type signature in an instance, called at ghc/GHCi/UI/Monad.hs:288:15 in ghc-bin-9.10.1-33a2:GHCi.UI.Monad
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/haskeline/System/Console/Haskeline/InputT.hs:53:39 in haskeline-0.8.2.1-fbbc:System.Console.Haskeline.InputT
  a type signature in an instance, called at libraries/haskeline/System/Console/Haskeline/InputT.hs:53:39 in haskeline-0.8.2.1-fbbc:System.Console.Haskeline.InputT
  throwM, called at ghc/GHCi/UI/Monad.hs:215:52 in ghc-bin-9.10.1-33a2:GHCi.UI.Monad


cabal-tests: callProcess: /home/allbery/.local/share/ghcup/ghc/9.10.1/bin/runghc-9.10.1 "--" "--ghc-arg=-i" "--ghc-arg=-hide-all-packages" "--ghc-arg=-no-user-package-db" "--ghc-arg=-package-db" "--ghc-arg=/home/allbery/.local/state/cabal/store/ghc-9.10.1/package.db" "--ghc-arg=-package-db" "--ghc-arg=/home/allbery/Sources/cabal/dist-newstyle/packagedb/ghc-9.10.1" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=Cabal-3.12.0.0-inplace" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=Cabal-syntax-3.12.0.0-inplace" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=base-4.20.0.0-4014" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=bytestring-0.12.1.0-f8cd" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=cabal-testsuite-3-inplace" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=directory-1.3.8.3-07b9" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=exceptions-0.10.7-3f06" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=filepath-1.5.2.0-8683" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=process-1.6.19.0-20e6" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=time-1.12.2-ab16" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=transformers-0.6.1.1-6dc7" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=unix-2.8.5.1-e9c3" "cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs" "--builddir" "/home/allbery/Sources/cabal/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.10.1/cabal-testsuite-3" "cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs" "--with-cabal" "/home/allbery/Sources/cabal/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.6.4/cabal-install-3.11.0.0/x/cabal/build/cabal/cabal" "--with-ghc" "ghc-9.10.1" (exit 1): failed
HasCallStack backtrace:
  collectBacktraces, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/Exception.hs:92:13 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.Exception
  toExceptionWithBacktrace, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO.hs:260:11 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO
  throwIO, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO/Exception.hs:315:19 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO.Exception
  ioException, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO/Exception.hs:319:20 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO.Exception

I don't even see what the failure is here.

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T21:36:16Z

Oh, got it. Except that I don't see why it's looking for a ghc-9.6.4 inplace build of cabal when I told it to use ghc-9.10.1.

ETA: gotta specify -w ghc-9.10.1 everywhere, it seems. Including cabal list-bin.

Reproduced test failure locally. Remaining questions:

why only with ghc 9.10.1?
convincing git bisect to make this work with other commits, which I should be able to get from the docs

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T22:20:58Z

Potentially I need 3 different patch files to make this work….

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-01T22:33:23Z

@geekosaur are you seeing the same failure that's currently shown in CI? (UNEXPECTED FAIL: PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs PackageTests/CustomTestCoverage/cabal.test.hs)

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T22:34:13Z

Yes.

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T22:36:18Z

Can you think of any reasons why this dots issue would only show up with 9.10.1?

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T22:39:22Z

Also, as I feared, it just ran out of commits it could apply the 9.10 patch to (it can only apply to commits that have project-cabal currently).

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-01T23:01:55Z

@geekosaur

Can you think of any reasons why this dots issue would only show up with 9.10.1?

#10058 (comment)

geekosaur · 2024-06-01T23:46:36Z

Yeh, so bisect finds nothing. All commits fail. I'm at something of a loss as to how to test for the included Cabal in ghc 9.10.1 being the problem, since using the commit's Cabal may well fail with ghc 9.10.1 for other reasons.

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-03T12:23:05Z

A simple sanity check that would be great to do, I think, is to check that changes from #9671 are still present on the 3.12 branch and weren't lost due to any quick conflict resolutions.

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-03T13:45:11Z

Trying to repro it locally gives me a jarring exception:

/home/artem/.ghcup/ghc/9.10.1/bin/runghc-9.10.1 -- '--ghc-arg=-i' '--ghc-arg=-hide-all-packages' '--ghc-arg=-no-user-package-db' '--ghc-arg=-package-db' '--ghc-arg=/home/artem/.cabal/store/ghc-9.10.1/package.db' '--ghc-arg=-package-db' '--ghc-arg=/mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/dist-newstyle/packagedb/ghc-9.10.1' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=Cabal-3.12.0.0-inplace' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=Cabal-syntax-3.12.0.0-inplace' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=base-4.20.0.0-4014' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=bytestring-0.12.1.0-f8cd' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=cabal-testsuite-3-inplace' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=directory-1.3.8.3-07b9' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=exceptions-0.10.7-3f06' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=filepath-1.5.2.0-8683' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=process-1.6.19.0-20e6' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=time-1.12.2-ab16' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=transformers-0.6.1.1-6dc7' '--ghc-arg=-package-id' '--ghc-arg=unix-2.8.5.1-e9c3' ./cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs --builddir /mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.10.1/cabal-testsuite-3 ./cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs '--extra-package-db=/mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/testdb/intree/dist-newstyle/packagedb/ghc-9.10.1' --with-cabal /mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.10.1/cabal-install-3.11.0.0/x/cabal/build/cabal/cabal
cabal.test.hs: VerboseException [("dieWithException",SrcLoc {srcLocPackage = "Cabal-3.12.0.0-inplace", srcLocModule = "Distribution.Simple.Program.Db", srcLocFile = "src/Distribution/Simple/Program/Db.hs", srcLocStartLine = 372, srcLocStartCol = 16, srcLocEndLine = 372, srcLocEndCol = 32})] 1717421519.232528422s (Verbosity {vLevel = Normal, vFlags = fromList [], vQuiet = False}) (ConfigureProgram "cabal" "/mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.10.1/cabal-install-3.11.0.0/x/cabal/build/cabal/cabal")
HasCallStack backtrace:
  collectBacktraces, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/Exception.hs:92:13 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.Exception
  toExceptionWithBacktrace, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO.hs:260:11 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO
  throwIO, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:371:12 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at compiler/GHC/Driver/Monad.hs:167:54 in ghc-9.10.1-69c3:GHC.Driver.Monad
  a type signature in an instance, called at compiler/GHC/Driver/Monad.hs:167:54 in ghc-9.10.1-69c3:GHC.Driver.Monad
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at ghc/GHCi/UI/Monad.hs:288:15 in ghc-bin-9.10.1-33a2:GHCi.UI.Monad
  a type signature in an instance, called at ghc/GHCi/UI/Monad.hs:288:15 in ghc-bin-9.10.1-33a2:GHCi.UI.Monad
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/exceptions/src/Control/Monad/Catch.hs:490:21 in exceptions-0.10.7-3f06:Control.Monad.Catch
  throwM, called at libraries/haskeline/System/Console/Haskeline/InputT.hs:53:39 in haskeline-0.8.2.1-fbbc:System.Console.Haskeline.InputT
  a type signature in an instance, called at libraries/haskeline/System/Console/Haskeline/InputT.hs:53:39 in haskeline-0.8.2.1-fbbc:System.Console.Haskeline.InputT
  throwM, called at ghc/GHCi/UI/Monad.hs:215:52 in ghc-bin-9.10.1-33a2:GHCi.UI.Monad


cabal-tests: callProcess: /home/artem/.ghcup/ghc/9.10.1/bin/runghc-9.10.1 "--" "--ghc-arg=-i" "--ghc-arg=-hide-all-packages" "--ghc-arg=-no-user-package-db" "--ghc-arg=-package-db" "--ghc-arg=/home/artem/.cabal/store/ghc-9.10.1/package.db" "--ghc-arg=-package-db" "--ghc-arg=/mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/dist-newstyle/packagedb/ghc-9.10.1" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=Cabal-3.12.0.0-inplace" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=Cabal-syntax-3.12.0.0-inplace" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=base-4.20.0.0-4014" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=bytestring-0.12.1.0-f8cd" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=cabal-testsuite-3-inplace" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=directory-1.3.8.3-07b9" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=exceptions-0.10.7-3f06" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=filepath-1.5.2.0-8683" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=process-1.6.19.0-20e6" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=time-1.12.2-ab16" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=transformers-0.6.1.1-6dc7" "--ghc-arg=-package-id" "--ghc-arg=unix-2.8.5.1-e9c3" "./cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs" "--builddir" "/mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.10.1/cabal-testsuite-3" "./cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Regression/T9640/cabal.test.hs" "--extra-package-db=/mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/testdb/intree/dist-newstyle/packagedb/ghc-9.10.1" "--with-cabal" "/mnt/data/artem/Dev/cabal/head/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-linux/ghc-9.10.1/cabal-install-3.11.0.0/x/cabal/build/cabal/cabal" (exit 1): failed
HasCallStack backtrace:
  collectBacktraces, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/Exception.hs:92:13 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.Exception
  toExceptionWithBacktrace, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO.hs:260:11 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO
  throwIO, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO/Exception.hs:315:19 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO.Exception
  ioException, called at libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/IO/Exception.hs:319:20 in ghc-internal:GHC.Internal.IO.Exception

Also, I dug a little into #9671, and at least the CI-related part of it (the --intree-cabal-lib flag in validate.sh) is present in 3.12.

geekosaur · 2024-06-03T15:29:13Z

I hit that one as well; it's because cabal list-bin cabal needs to be told the ghc version used to build it, or it looks for a cabal built with your default ghc version instead.

cabal list-bin -w ghc-9.10.1 cabal

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-03T15:46:39Z

my default is 9.10 :-) I never use -w, I always do ghcup set because I don't trust -w :-)
but after you're saying it, i could dig deeper. I'm currently using CI on my fork as my default...

geekosaur · 2024-06-03T16:01:33Z

A quick look suggests that the path contains Cabal-3.11.0.0 instead of Cabal-3.12.0.0?

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-03T16:45:21Z

I think I found the missing piece of #9671: it's #9954. Backporting now...

More consistently pass --package-db flag to tests (backport #9954) #10067

* CI: add GHC 9.10 * GHC 9.10 compat in testsuite: CPP symbols don't get passed to CC as eagearly Discussion: #9914 (comment) Related GHC issue: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/21291 * GHC 9.10 compat in tests: disable tests regressing due to #9940 (cherry picked from commit 3a8c69c)

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-03T21:00:53Z

All right, Linux has succeeded, so I assume we're good here. ~~Need a second review.~~

ulysses4ever · 2024-06-03T21:01:49Z

Correction: backports don't need a second review.

mergify bot mentioned this pull request May 29, 2024

CI: add GHC 9.10 #9914

Merged

2 tasks

mergify bot added the backport label May 29, 2024

ulysses4ever approved these changes May 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

ulysses4ever added the squash+merge me Tell Mergify Bot to squash-merge label May 29, 2024

ulysses4ever mentioned this pull request May 29, 2024

3.12.1.0 — a minor release of Cabal and friends #9885

Closed

18 tasks

ulysses4ever force-pushed the mergify/bp/3.12/pr-9914 branch from e62a2ea to 5c6f670 Compare May 30, 2024 13:56

ulysses4ever force-pushed the mergify/bp/3.12/pr-9914 branch from 5c6f670 to 604c68a Compare June 3, 2024 19:53

mergify bot merged commit 78e9ee0 into 3.12 Jun 3, 2024

mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/3.12/pr-9914 branch June 3, 2024 22:47

CI: add GHC 9.10 (backport #9914) #10058

CI: add GHC 9.10 (backport #9914) #10058

Uh oh!

Conversation

mergify bot commented May 29, 2024

Uh oh!

Mikolaj commented May 29, 2024

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented May 29, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 1, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 3, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024

Uh oh!

geekosaur commented Jun 3, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

geekosaur commented Jun 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

geekosaur commented Jun 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

geekosaur commented Jun 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ulysses4ever commented Jun 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading