Fix mistake in BuildInfo.Lens.hs#10609
Conversation
Guilty as charged. For a change this obvious and small, the mental effort required to process the template was higher than the one required to fix the bug. I mean no disrespect though. |
|
No worries. This needs a changelog, does it not? |
Mikolaj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, this does not look like an obvious exception from the changelog rule. But well spotted!
|
@andreabedini: a humble ping? |
579e653 to
7caadcd
Compare
ulysses4ever
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good modulo draft state of the changelog, which I proposed how to fix.
|
Should we fast-track this just to get us to the 3.16 finish line faster? |
|
yes |
|
@andreabedini I think it's time to rebase and add the |
|
Also it occurs to me that nobody noticed (cf. #10609 (review)) because of #7072 and in general considerable confusion about |
|
@Mikolaj, can you re-review or at least dismiss your changes-requested now that the changelog entry has been added? |
|
@mergify rebase |
❌ Command disallowed due to command restrictions in the Mergify configuration.Details
|
```
cxxSources f s = fmap (\x -> s{T.cSources = x}) (f (T.cxxSources s))
```
should be
```
cxxSources f s = fmap (\x -> s{T.cxxSources = x}) (f (T.cxxSources s))
```
6577068 to
ca191dd
Compare
should be