Skip to content

Conversation

@phadej
Copy link
Collaborator

@phadej phadej commented Feb 1, 2023

This breaks cabal install --lib I guess. But it's broken anyway, so I don't mind.

@phadej
Copy link
Collaborator Author

phadej commented Feb 1, 2023

Actually I think this change breaks the whole fix done #8623, the idea how to fix the issue there is wrong. local tarballs are not local packages, if you ask me, that's not negotiable.

So i expect tests to fail. I'll let maintainers decide how to proceed. #8719 is important issue, it causes project planning failure.

@Mikolaj
Copy link
Member

Mikolaj commented Feb 8, 2023

This breaks cabal install --lib I guess.

Oleg, could you elaborate? Does it break --lib as it was before the PR (#8744) or would it only break any suspected improvement to --lib that this PR supposedly confers?

@phadej
Copy link
Collaborator Author

phadej commented Feb 8, 2023

Does it break --lib as it was before the PR (#8744) or would it only break any suspected improvement to --lib that this PR supposedly confers?

I don't know.

@Mikolaj
Copy link
Member

Mikolaj commented Feb 8, 2023

OK, Thank you. In that case I won't worry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants