Document possible failures of removing directories on Windows#108
Merged
Rufflewind merged 4 commits intohaskell:masterfrom Jun 20, 2020
LaurentRDC:master
Merged
Document possible failures of removing directories on Windows#108Rufflewind merged 4 commits intohaskell:masterfrom LaurentRDC:master
Rufflewind merged 4 commits intohaskell:masterfrom
LaurentRDC:master
Conversation
Rufflewind
requested changes
Jun 18, 2020
Rufflewind
reviewed
Jun 19, 2020
Rufflewind
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2020
Member
|
Thank you! |
Member
|
It looks like there's an algorithm for deleting directories on Windows without the need for retries: #110 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
Recently, I have come across a rare but reproducible problem on Windows here. Removing directories recursively using
removeDirectoryRecursivewould sometimes fail. This has been documented in many places, including in #96.This pull request documents this behavior for future users.