Conversation
|
Hi @zolotokrylin |
Time Submission Status
|
Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@zolotokrylin has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughUpdate CONTRIBUTING.md to prefer singular "Pull Request (PR)" and reformat the Drafting section into a numbered three-step process (open draft PR, link to Problem, assign reviewer). Add a new COMPENSATION.md describing compensation principles, tiered expectations, and growth guidance. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Contributor as Contributor
participant Repo as Repository
participant Problem as Problem Tracker
participant Reviewer as Reviewer
rect rgb(235,245,255)
Note over Contributor,Repo: Drafting workflow (new)
Contributor->>Repo: Open draft Pull Request (PR)
Repo-->>Contributor: Draft PR created
Contributor->>Problem: Link PR to Problem
Problem-->>Repo: Association recorded
Contributor->>Reviewer: Assign at least one reviewer
Reviewer-->>Repo: Reviewer assigned
Contributor->>Repo: Mark PR ready (after review assigned)
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Added a comprehensive compensation guide outlining principles, expectations, and team culture for various roles. Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/COMPENSATION.md (2)
1-11: Tighten wording in compensation principles.Line 7 uses "end results" which is slightly wordy. Consider simplifying to "results" for conciseness.
-* Clear incentives . All salaries and bonuses are based on a simple merit system. The more you contribute by independently delivering end results, the more rewards you will receive. Doing the same job at the same level is paid the same regardless of location or other factors. +* Clear incentives . All salaries and bonuses are based on a simple merit system. The more you contribute by independently delivering results, the more rewards you will receive. Doing the same job at the same level is paid the same regardless of location or other factors.
54-63: Remove informal language and strengthen word choice.The section uses several instances of informal or weak language inconsistent with professional documentation:
- Line 56: "haha" is too casual; remove or replace with "though"
- Lines 61–63: "amazing" (2×) is informal; use "excellent" or "exceptional"
- Line 62: "very strong point of view" — "very" is a weak intensifier; use "strong" alone
- Line 61: "Be comfortable with being" should be "Be comfortable being"
Also apply these word-choice fixes in the HTML refactor above.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/COMPENSATION.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/COMPENSATION.md
[style] ~7-~7: ‘end results’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... contribute by independently delivering end results, the more rewards you will receive. Doi...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_END_RESULTS)
[style] ~56-~56: To elevate your writing, try using a synonym here.
Context: ...we’d love that, haha). Some of them are hard to pack or to remember. Others get blur...
(HARD_TO)
[style] ~61-~61: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...s, devs, and so on) to make the project amazing.
* Inspire others. Become someone ou...
(AWESOME)
[style] ~61-~61: Consider using “comfortable being”.
Context: ...ry members when they are stuck.
* Be comfortable with being on the business side of things. (discus...
(COMFORTABLE_WITH_VBG)
[style] ~62-~62: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...r>* Be able to join the action and show amazing crafting skills when needed.
* Becom...
(AWESOME)
[style] ~62-~62: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...tion to big-picture strategy.
* Have very strong point of view but open to other people’...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
.github/COMPENSATION.md
60-60: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
60-60: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
60-60: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
60-60: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
61-61: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
61-61: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
61-61: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
61-61: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
61-61: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
61-61: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
62-62: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
62-62: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
62-62: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
62-62: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
62-62: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
62-62: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
62-62: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
63-63: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
63-63: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
63-63: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
63-63: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
63-63: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
63-63: Spaces inside emphasis markers
(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/COMPENSATION.md (1)
12-53: Framework tables are well-structured and clear.The three-level progression across Team culture, Goals, and Problems & Solutions is easy to understand and provides good visual clarity for the tiered expectations.
Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/COMPENSATION.md (1)
15-18: Consider minor wording refinements for formality and clarity.Two suggestions:
- Line 17: "Distribute to best fit" → "Distribute to the best fit" (article usage)
- Line 15–18: Capitalization inconsistency—some cells use sentence case ("Execute tasks") while others use sentence fragments ("Student mindset:"). Standardize for consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/COMPENSATION.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/COMPENSATION.md
[uncategorized] ~17-~17: The preposition ‘as’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...Ensure delivery. | Delegate. Distribute to best fit. | | Partner | Big-picture...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_TO_AS)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/COMPENSATION.md (4)
1-10: Clear and well-structured opening with strong positioning.The header establishes the core philosophy effectively, and the Core Rules section clearly communicates the two foundational principles. The link placement is helpful for context.
11-18: Verify level naming consistency: "Partner" vs. "Principal".The AI summary references four levels as "Entry, Intermediate, Lead, Principal," but the code uses "Partner" instead. Confirm this is intentional or update for consistency with internal documentation.
13-18: Ensure external links remain valid and complete.The document references multiple external URLs (lines 5, 15, 16, 17, 18):
https://holdex.io/c/jobshttps://holdex.io/abouthttps://holdex.io/c/learn/principleshttps://holdex.io/c/learn/github-strategyVerify these endpoints exist and will remain stable. Also note that PR objective #3 ("Redirect https://holdex.io/c/learn/compensation-guide to the relevant holdex/developers page") is not yet in scope—plan for that separately.
1-27: Overall: Clear compensation framework document ready for publication.The document successfully establishes a tiered compensation and growth framework with clear principles, expectations per level, and progression paths. The structure is logical and the content is accessible. Ensure the level naming is consistent with internal references and external links are stable before publication.
Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
Removed link to DOs & DON'Ts from the README. Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
1 participant
resolves https://github.com/holdex/hr/issues/102
Summary by CodeRabbit