docs: view explanation regarding communication in Goal

[teodorus-nathaniel]

resolves https://github.com/holdex/operations/issues/249

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Introduced new guidelines to help contributors maintain focused discussions on goal progress, clarifying the use of channels for problem tracking and specification clarifications.

• Chores

  • Improved formatting for process check sections to enhance clarity.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@teodorus-nathaniel has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5efbaa6 and 0e216b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/CONTRIBUTING.md (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the contributing guidelines by adding a new "Communication within Goal issues" section. The section outlines clear instructions for how contributors should handle discussions regarding Goal issues, specifying where to direct clarifications and how to manage potential obstacles. Additionally, the CI Checks section in the document has been reformatted for improved clarity and consistency.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md	Added "Communication within Goal issues" section with guidelines for redirecting discussions and clarifying problem tracking; adjusted formatting for CI Checks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Contributor
    participant IssueTracker as GitHub Issues
    participant SpecDoc as Spec Document

    Contributor->>IssueTracker: Search for existing Problem issue
    alt Existing Problem Issue Found
        IssueTracker-->>Contributor: Reference to Problem issue
    else No Problem Issue Found
        Contributor->>SpecDoc: Seek clarification on Goal
        alt Clarification Obtained
            SpecDoc-->>Contributor: Provide clarification details
        else No Clarification
            Contributor->>IssueTracker: Create a new Problem issue
        end
    end

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• docs(Goal): provide ETA and ensure Specs presents #51: Addresses the enhancement of contributing guidelines by clarifying the documentation of Goal discussions, closely aligning with the changes made in this pull request.

Suggested reviewers

• matthewvogas
• angelicawill
• lwtsn
• markholdex
• georgeciubotaru

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/CONTRIBUTING.md (1)

35-45: Clarify and Enhance the New “Communication within Goal issues” Section
The new section is well-structured and clearly outlines the appropriate channels for communication regarding Goal issues. One minor nitpick: consider revising the sentence on line 45 from:

“Avoid extended discussions in Goal issues. Instead, move conversations to the relevant Spec document or Problem issue.”
to
“Avoid extended discussions on Goal issues. Instead, move conversations to the relevant Spec document or Problem issue.”
This small change aligns with the static analysis hint regarding the use of “on” instead of “in” for enhanced readability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d678e82 and 5efbaa6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/CONTRIBUTING.md (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

.github/CONTRIBUTING.md

[uncategorized] ~49-~49: The preposition “on” seems more likely in this position than the preposition “in”.
Context: ...s it there. Avoid extended discussions in Goal issues. Instead, move conversation...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION_IN_ON)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/CONTRIBUTING.md (1)

108-110: CI Checks Section Formatting Improvement
The reformatting of the CI Checks bullet points now improves clarity by ensuring proper alignment. The updated list items for the pr-time-tracker and code-rabbit checks are clear and concise.