docs(advocacy): add experience in LinkedIn & mention Holdex in X

[tiffmyaaw]

fix https://github.com/holdex/ops/issues/66

Summary by CodeRabbit

Documentation

• Updated advocacy guidelines with new mandatory requirements for professional social media profiles
• Added mandatory Experience description to LinkedIn profile section with organizational information
• Expanded X (Twitter) profile requirements including mandatory role identification, website portfolio link, and location field

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation update to advocacy guidelines file establishing mandatory profile requirements. Additions include required Experience description about Holdex for LinkedIn profiles and expanded X (Twitter) profile requirements specifying role mention, website link, and location field settings.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation Updates \.github/ADVOCACY\.md	Added mandatory Experience description under LinkedIn profile section with Holdex descriptive paragraph. Expanded X (Twitter) Profile section with new requirements: role @HoldexIo mention in profile description, Holdex website/portfolio link, and Location field set to localhost.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Single file modification containing documentation/guideline updates only
• No code logic changes or functional alterations
• Straightforward additions to existing profile requirements

Suggested reviewers

• dante4rt

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR addresses the linked issue #66 by updating the Advocating Guidelines with new LinkedIn profile requirements including Experience descriptions and X/Twitter profile mandatory fields.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are within scope—the PR only modifies .github/ADVOCACY.md to add LinkedIn and X profile requirements as specified in the linked issue.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main changes: adding an experience description for LinkedIn and requiring Holdex mention in X profile, which aligns with the file modifications in ADVOCACY.md.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[tiffmyaaw]

@zolotokrylin I couldn't add you as reviewer and myself as the assignee

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

.github/ADVOCACY.md (2)

48-49: Minor: Article and styling adjustments for LinkedIn Experience description.

Line 49 reads "Holdex is premier partner..." but should be "Holdex is a premier partner..." for grammatical correctness.

Additionally, Line 48 uses backticks around Mandatory, but the document style elsewhere uses bold formatting. Consider using **Mandatory** for consistency or plain text if it's meant to be unemphasized.

-Mandatory `Experience` description:
-> Holdex is premier partner for institutions pioneering DeFi & RWAs. Hong Kong-based since 2016, we turn bold visions into secure, scalable blockchain solutions – driving adoption with unmatched expertise.
+**Mandatory** Experience description:
+> Holdex is **a** premier partner for institutions pioneering DeFi & RWAs. Hong Kong-based since 2016, we turn bold visions into secure, scalable blockchain solutions – driving adoption with unmatched expertise.

---

51-55: Formatting inconsistency: X (Twitter) requirements lack table structure used elsewhere.

The GitHub profile requirements (lines 29–41) use a clear table format for acceptance criteria, while the X (Twitter) profile requirements (lines 53–55) use bullet points. For better readability and consistency, consider adopting a table format or moving these into the existing structure.

This is a minor UX/readability concern and can be deferred if the current format is preferred.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c854427 and 0e84859.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/ADVOCACY.md (1 hunks)

[holdex]

Time Submission Status

Member	Status	Time	Action	Last Update
tiffmyaaw	✅ Submitted	30min	Update time	Nov 23, 2025, 11:12 AM
zolotokrylin	✅ Submitted	15min	Update time	Nov 23, 2025, 11:12 AM

[zolotokrylin]

wrong naming of the PR

[tiffmyaaw]

@zolotokrylin revised

[zolotokrylin]

@tiffmyaaw, this is not how we request reviews. See the guidelines.
cc: @markholdex

[zolotokrylin]

Your naming isn’t right. It should be user-oriented, as per our guidelines. I would reject your request again, but you didn’t request a review from me since the time I rejected it.

[tiffmyaaw]

Your naming isn’t right. It should be user-oriented, as per our guidelines. I would reject your request again, but you didn’t request a review from me since the time I rejected it.

@zolotokrylin I couldn't tag you as a reviewer, I don't have access for it. Or do you mean tagging like this within the comment?

[zolotokrylin]

@tiffmyaaw