Skip to content

Conversation

@glesur
Copy link
Contributor

@glesur glesur commented Jun 5, 2025

The work done by the gravity force in shearing box was not properly removed when using fargo (cf #344 ). This led to incorrect energetics. This PR fixes this issue

The work done by the gravity force was not properly removed when using
fargo
@glesur glesur added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 5, 2025
  was added in addSourceTerms
- fix reference file in Shearing box tests following this bug fix.
@glesur glesur merged commit b22cd25 into develop Jun 12, 2025
38 checks passed
@glesur glesur deleted the fixFargoSBEnergy branch June 12, 2025 12:08
@glesur glesur mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2025
glesur added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2025
## [2.2.02] 2025-10-18
### Changed

- Added a module to add explicit units (#338)
- fixed a bug that could lead to incorrect profiling information on non-blocking cuda loops (#341)
- fixed a bug that could lead to incorrect energy budget when shearing box and fargo were both enabled (#346)
- fixed a bug that led to incorrect BX2 reconstruction when axis is not used on both sides of the domain (#345)
- fixed a bug that led to incorrect reflective boundary conditions on B when DIMENSIONS < 3 (#345)
- fixed a bug that led to incorrect dust stopping time when the adiabatic equation of state is used with "size" drag law (#353)

### Added

- documentation for the continuous integration (#354)
---------

Co-authored-by: Victor Réville <victorreville@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hal Bal <vreville@irap.omp.eu>
Co-authored-by: Jean Kempf <jean.kempf@irap.omp.eu>
Co-authored-by: Victor Réville <47865059+vreville@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants