chore(organization_webhook): fix insecure_ssl#2196
chore(organization_webhook): fix insecure_ssl#2196kfcampbell merged 2 commits intointegrations:mainfrom EttoreFoti:f-github_organization_webhook_insecure_ssl
Conversation
|
@EttoreFoti can you describe (and perhaps include output from) the testing process you used here, since integration tests aren't added? |
Just run the current AcceptanceTest that was previously failing, I can copy paste output if needed. |
|
@kfcampbell hello! Can you please review and release if it is all ok? thanks! |
|
@kfcampbell any update on this? |
|
The test used to panic for me and now it's failing. I'm seeing the following output: The specific error is: but that's possibly related to the org I'm using for testing and/or a dirty integration test setup. Does it pass cleanly now for you? |
kfcampbell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Regardless of whether the issue is one of test setup on my side, this is an improvement over the current test setup, so I'm comfortable taking the change as-is.
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [github](https://registry.terraform.io/providers/integrations/github) ([source](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github)) | required_provider | patch | `6.2.0` -> `6.2.1` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>integrations/terraform-provider-github (github)</summary> ### [`v6.2.1`](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/releases/tag/v6.2.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/compare/v6.2.0...v6.2.1) <!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yml at main --> #### What's Changed ##### 🐛 Bugfixes - chore(actions_runner_group): fix missing schema id by [@​EttoreFoti](https://togithub.com/EttoreFoti) in [https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2195](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2195) - chore(organization_webhook): fix insecure_ssl by [@​EttoreFoti](https://togithub.com/EttoreFoti) in [https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2196](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2196) ##### 🛠️ Maintenance - build(deps): bump actions/add-to-project from 0.6.0 to 0.6.1 by [@​dependabot](https://togithub.com/dependabot) in [https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2210](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2210) - build(deps): bump github.com/golangci/golangci-lint from 1.56.2 to 1.57.1 by [@​dependabot](https://togithub.com/dependabot) in [https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2209](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2209) #### New Contributors - [@​EttoreFoti](https://togithub.com/EttoreFoti) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2195](https://togithub.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/pull/2195) **Full Changelog**: integrations/terraform-provider-github@v6.2.0...v6.2.1 </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://togithub.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy4yNzEuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM3LjI3MS4wIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiJ9--> Co-authored-by: kireque-bot[bot] <143391978+kireque-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Resolves #2142
Before the change?
After the change?
Pull request checklist
Both are not needed since it's just a fix over already existing resource.
Does this introduce a breaking change?