Skip to content

use cbor_ntohl instead of ntohl directly #218

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
thiagomacieira merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2022
Merged

use cbor_ntohl instead of ntohl directly #218

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions src/compilersupport_p.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
(defined(BYTE_ORDER) && defined(LITTLE_ENDIAN) && BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN) || \
defined(_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN__) || defined(__ARMEL__) || defined(__MIPSEL__) || \
defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__amd64)
# define ntohll(x) ((ntohl((uint32_t)(x)) * UINT64_C(0x100000000)) + (ntohl((x) >> 32)))
# define ntohll(x) ((cbor_ntohl((uint32_t)(x)) * UINT64_C(0x100000000)) + (cbor_ntohl((x) >> 32)))
# define htonll ntohll
# else
# error "Unable to determine byte order!"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -202,4 +202,3 @@ static inline bool add_check_overflow(size_t v1, size_t v2, size_t *r)
}

#endif /* COMPILERSUPPORT_H */