-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
[uss_qualifier] Add EGM2008 support on uspace/netrid/msl #1302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How large are those? Is it realistic to have them in the CI so that we can add unit tests covering this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If my understanding is correct, I think it's on the order of 150MB which technically we could have in the CI, but I would probably recommend against since it's a rare feature that would consume resources disproportionate to its importance. But, in the absence of CI involvement, we need some kind of indication for why we're confident a change is correct -- in this case, I'd expect some kind of statement like "I temporarily changed mock_uss to report EGM2008 altitudes and the netrid_v22a test configuration passed locally" in the PR description.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the files for the original implementations are in that order ( https://earth-info.nga.mil/index.php?dir=wgs84&action=wgs84 )
It does seems that pyproj's version is around 80M ( https://cdn.proj.org/ , search for
EPSG:3855), but that still 10 times actual size of the monitoring's code folder.For testing, I did a different approach (switched to EGM2008 as reference but still returning EGM98, to ensure it failed as altitudes should be different), but I will do a 'positive' run.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I updated the description of the PR with manual tests results. Note that I did ran the uspace configuration, as the netrid_v22a is not running
scenarios.uspace.netrid.msl.MSLAltitude. Is that expected?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, right -- yes, MSLAltitude is a special requirement for U-space and isn't an ASTM requirement, so running in the uspace scenario and not running in netrid_v22a is expected (with hindsight).