Skip to content

Conversation

@jaredmauch
Copy link
Owner

Stashed branch that I am using in production. Intent is to resolve conflicts to make a cleaner PR to origin branch

@jaredmauch jaredmauch merged commit 0b216fb into main Aug 27, 2025
@jaredmauch jaredmauch deleted the parallel_fix branch August 27, 2025 14:32
@BuxtonCalvin
Copy link

I was reading through some of your code changes and it appears that you're considering multiple transports for outgoing data. Is that for a single inverter data read? Or is the locking code for multiple reads /parallel inverter reads? Anyway, I'm interested in the idea of a multi-transport out setup so as not to spam my network with unnecessary data fields, but the original author is not interested and doesn't have the time. So I'm getting it done by spinning up three distinct containers, one for type of transport. Which is probably not so healthy for the inverter API. As well, I was considering writing a timescaledb transport based on your influx transport, but it appears from your other EG4 project that you're already using postgres (without the timescaledb extension). Any chance on you writing a timescaledb transport, as I can see from your changes that you would do it a million times better than I could. Thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants