Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Alex-huxiyang has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Walkthrough此拉取请求更新了CI工作流配置，增加了对分支的额外规范和作业定义的修改。 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #2690 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.07% 84.07%
=======================================
Files 217 217
Lines 17830 17830
Branches 2608 2608
=======================================
Hits 14991 14991
Misses 2834 2834
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/ci.yml
26-26: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
26-26: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
26-26: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:6:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
7-7: 工作流触发器配置更新已完善！
工作流程现在同时支持 V3.0 和 next 分支，并通过 pull_request_target 增加了对外部 PR 的安全处理。这些更改使 CI 工作流程更加完整和安全。
Also applies to: 11-13
| run: | | ||
| if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then | ||
| echo "label=2.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV | ||
| elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "V3.0" ]]; then | ||
| echo "label=3.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV | ||
| else | ||
| echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
建议改进 shell 脚本的安全性
当前的 shell 脚本可能存在单词分割和通配符扩展的风险。建议进行以下优化：
if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then
- echo "label=2.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+ echo "label=2.x" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "V3.0" ]]; then
- echo "label=3.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+ echo "label=3.x" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
else
- echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+ echo "label=" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
fi📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| run: | | |
| if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then | |
| echo "label=2.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV | |
| elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "V3.0" ]]; then | |
| echo "label=3.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV | |
| else | |
| echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV | |
| run: | | |
| if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then | |
| echo "label=2.x" >> "$GITHUB_ENV" | |
| elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "V3.0" ]]; then | |
| echo "label=3.x" >> "$GITHUB_ENV" | |
| else | |
| echo "label=" >> "$GITHUB_ENV" | |
| fi |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
26-26: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
26-26: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
26-26: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:6:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| label: | ||
| add-label: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
需要更新 GitHub Token 配置
工作流程中仍在使用 GITHUB_TOKEN，但根据需求应该使用 PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN。具体位置：
.github/workflows/ci.yml: 第 24-32 行的标签添加操作使用了github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}.github/workflows/issue-close.yml: 也在使用GITHUB_TOKEN，但这个文件不在当前 PR 的修改范围内
🔗 Analysis chain
请确认访问令牌的使用！
标签添加任务的改进很好，但有以下几点需要注意：
- 分支判断逻辑更完善了，添加了对非匹配分支的处理
- 根据 PR 描述，应该使用 PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN，但代码中仍在使用 GITHUB_TOKEN
建议验证令牌权限是否满足需求：
Also applies to: 24-32, 35-40
Let me check the actual token usage in these files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查工作流程中的令牌使用情况
rg -l "GITHUB_TOKEN|PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check token usage in workflow files
rg "GITHUB_TOKEN|PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN" .github/workflows/ -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 682
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
Line range hint
33-38: Token 配置需要更新根据之前的讨论，这里应该使用
PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN而不是GITHUB_TOKEN。建议修改：
- name: Add label to Pull Request if: env.label != '' uses: actions-ecosystem/action-add-labels@v1 with: - github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + github_token: ${{ secrets.PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN }} labels: ${{ env.label }}🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
24-24: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
24-24: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
24-24: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:6:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/ci.yml
24-24: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
24-24: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
24-24: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:6:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
15-19: 作业和步骤命名更新符合最佳实践
重命名作业从 label 到 add-label 使其更具描述性，步骤描述的简化也提高了可读性。
| - V3.0 | ||
| pull_request_target: | ||
| types: [assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened] | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: write-all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
工作流程存在潜在的安全风险，需要进行权限收紧和安全加固
工作流程中发现以下安全隐患：
- 使用
pull_request_target触发器时配合了actions/checkout@v4和代码构建/测试步骤，这可能导致恶意 PR 中的代码在具有仓库权限的环境中执行 permissions: write-all权限过于宽泛，违反最小权限原则- 在执行不受信任的代码之前没有进行适当的安全检查
建议进行如下修改：
- permissions: write-all
+ permissions:
+ pull-requests: write # 仅用于添加标签
+ contents: read # 用于检出代码
+ security-events: write # 用于代码扫描结果- pull_request_target:
+ pull_request:- 如果必须使用
pull_request_target，请确保在执行任何来自 PR 的代码之前添加适当的安全检查步骤
🔗 Analysis chain
注意：pull_request_target 触发器可能存在安全风险
pull_request_target 触发器在处理来自 fork 仓库的 PR 时会使用仓库的密钥，这可能带来潜在的安全风险。建议：
- 仅在必要时使用
pull_request_target - 确保在执行任何不受信任的代码之前进行适当的检查
- 考虑将
permissions范围限制在所需的最小权限，而不是使用write-all
建议修改权限配置：
-permissions: write-all
+permissions:
+ pull-requests: write # 用于添加标签
+ contents: read # 用于检出代码Let me gather more information about the workflow file to better understand the security implications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查工作流程中是否有适当的安全检查
rg -l "pull_request_target" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete workflow file content
cat .github/workflows/ci.yml
# Check if there are any checkout or code execution steps
rg -A 5 "uses:|run:" .github/workflows/ci.yml
Length of output: 4555
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
Line range hint
37-42: 需要统一访问令牌的使用根据之前的讨论，应该使用
PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN而不是GITHUB_TOKEN。建议修改令牌配置：
- name: Add label to Pull Request if: github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' && env.label != '' uses: actions-ecosystem/action-add-labels@v1 with: - github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + github_token: ${{ secrets.PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN }} labels: ${{ env.label }}🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:6:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/ci.yml
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:6:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
| pull_request_target: | ||
| types: [opened, synchronize, reopened] | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: write-all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
需要加强工作流程的安全性配置
当前配置存在以下安全隐患：
- 使用
pull_request_target触发器可能导致恶意 PR 中的代码在具有仓库权限的环境中执行 permissions: write-all权限过于宽泛，违反最小权限原则
建议进行如下修改：
- permissions: write-all
+ permissions:
+ pull-requests: write # 用于添加标签
+ contents: read # 用于检出代码
+ security-events: write # 用于代码扫描结果
pull_request_target:
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
+ paths-ignore:
+ - '**.md'
+ - 'docs/**'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pull_request_target: | |
| types: [opened, synchronize, reopened] | |
| workflow_dispatch: | |
| permissions: write-all | |
| pull_request_target: | |
| types: [opened, synchronize, reopened] | |
| paths-ignore: | |
| - '**.md' | |
| - 'docs/**' | |
| workflow_dispatch: | |
| permissions: | |
| pull-requests: write # 用于添加标签 | |
| contents: read # 用于检出代码 | |
| security-events: write # 用于代码扫描结果 |
| - name: Determine label based on target branch | ||
| id: determine-label | ||
| run: | | ||
| if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then | ||
| echo "label=2.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV | ||
| elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "V3.0" ]]; then | ||
| echo "label=3.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV | ||
| else | ||
| echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
需要改进 shell 脚本的安全性
当前脚本存在命令注入和单词分割的风险。
建议应用以下安全改进：
- name: Determine label based on target branch
id: determine-label
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then
- echo "label=2.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+ echo "label=2.x" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "V3.0" ]]; then
- echo "label=3.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+ echo "label=3.x" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
else
- echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+ echo "label=" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
fi另外建议添加输入验证：
- name: Determine label based on target branch
id: determine-label
run: |
+ # 验证输入分支名称
+ branch="${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}"
+ if [[ ! "$branch" =~ ^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$ ]]; then
+ echo "错误：无效的分支名称"
+ exit 1
+ fi
if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; thenCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:6:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
1 participant
🤔 这个变动的性质是？
🔗 相关 Issue
💡 需求背景和解决方案
☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单
Summary by CodeRabbit
新功能
V3.0分支的支持。pull_request_target触发器类型，支持更多事件。改进