Skip to content

Comments

fix: github actions permission#2981

Merged
oasis-cloud merged 1 commit intojdf2e:feat_v3.xfrom
Miles-hxy:fix_ci_grant4
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

fix: github actions permission#2981
oasis-cloud merged 1 commit intojdf2e:feat_v3.xfrom
Miles-hxy:fix_ci_grant4

Conversation

@Miles-hxy
Copy link
Collaborator

@Miles-hxy Miles-hxy commented Feb 11, 2025

🤔 这个变动的性质是?

  • 新特性提交
  • 日常 bug 修复
  • 站点、文档改进
  • 演示代码改进
  • 组件样式/交互改进
  • TypeScript 定义更新
  • 包体积优化
  • 性能优化
  • 功能增强
  • 国际化改进
  • 重构
  • 代码风格优化
  • 测试用例
  • 分支合并
  • 其他改动(是关于什么的改动?)

🔗 相关 Issue

💡 需求背景和解决方案

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项⚠️

  • 文档已补充或无须补充
  • 代码演示已提供或无须提供
  • TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
  • fork仓库代码是否为最新避免文件冲突
  • Files changed 没有 package.json lock 等无关文件

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • 优化了拉取请求标签处理流程,细化了权限管理和事件处理逻辑,从而提升了系统的稳定性和灵活性。

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Walkthrough

此次 PR 对 .github/workflows/pr-labels.yml 文件的工作流配置进行了更新。权限配置已由单一写权限调整为分别设置 checkscontentspull-requestsissues 的权限。同时,获取 PR 编号的逻辑加入了条件判断,以适应不同事件触发时的数值来源,提升了配置的健壮性。

Changes

文件 修改内容
.github/workflows/…/pr-labels.yml - 更新权限配置:由 write-all 改为分项权限(checks: write, contents: read, pull-requests: write, issues: write
- 调整获取 PR 编号的逻辑,增加条件判断以区分不同事件

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant G as GitHub Event
    participant W as Workflow
    participant P as Payload
    G->>W: 触发 PR 标签工作流
    W->>P: 检查是否存在 pull_request
    alt pull_request 存在
        P-->>W: 返回 pull_request.number
    else pull_request 不存在
        P-->>W: 返回 review.pull_request_number
    end
    W->>G: 使用获取的 PR 编号进行标签操作
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • oasis-cloud

Poem

我是一只爱敲代码的小兔,
在工作流中跳跃不停步;
权限细分如晨星闪烁,
条件判断让流程更护航,
🐰 代码快乐,跃入春光里!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added action:review This PR needs more reviews (less than 2 approvals) 3.x Target branch 3.x labels Feb 11, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.74%. Comparing base (a6fc424) to head (608644d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on feat_v3.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           feat_v3.x    #2981   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      85.74%   85.74%           
==========================================
  Files            277      277           
  Lines          18105    18105           
  Branches        2745     2745           
==========================================
  Hits           15524    15524           
  Misses          2576     2576           
  Partials           5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/pr-labels.yml (1)

63-70: 建议添加错误处理机制

当前的标签管理逻辑功能完整,但建议增加错误处理来提高可靠性:

  • 添加 try-catch 块捕获可能的 API 调用异常
  • 添加标签操作的结果验证
  • 在出错时通过 core.setFailed() 提供明确的错误信息

建议参考以下改进方案:

            // 根据 approved 数量添加对应标签
            const newLabel = approvedCount >= 2 ? 'action:merge' : 'action:review';
+           try {
              await github.rest.issues.addLabels({
                owner,
                repo,
                issue_number: pr_number,
                labels: [newLabel]
              });
+           } catch (error) {
+             core.setFailed(`添加标签失败: ${error.message}`);
+           }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6fc424 and 608644d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr-labels.yml (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pr-labels.yml (2)

9-13: 权限配置优化,提升了安全性!

write-all 权限细化为具体的最小权限集合是一个很好的改进:

  • checks: write - 用于状态检查
  • contents: read - 用于读取 PR 内容
  • pull-requests: write - 用于管理评审和标签
  • issues: write - 用于标签操作

这种精细化的权限控制符合最小权限原则,显著提高了工作流的安全性。


25-28: PR 编号获取逻辑更加健壮!

优化后的代码通过三元运算符优雅地处理了不同事件类型:

  • 优先从 pull_request 事件中获取编号
  • 如果不存在,则从 review 事件中获取
  • 中文注释清晰地说明了代码用途

这种改进确保了在不同触发条件下工作流都能正确获取 PR 编号。

@oasis-cloud oasis-cloud merged commit 565fc8d into jdf2e:feat_v3.x Feb 11, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.x Target branch 3.x action:review This PR needs more reviews (less than 2 approvals) size/S

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants