Skip to content

Comments

fix: 兼容选中值为0的情况#3192

Merged
xiaoyatong merged 2 commits intojdf2e:feat_v3.xfrom
irisSong:bugfix_pickerview
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

fix: 兼容选中值为0的情况#3192
xiaoyatong merged 2 commits intojdf2e:feat_v3.xfrom
irisSong:bugfix_pickerview

Conversation

@irisSong
Copy link
Collaborator

@irisSong irisSong commented Apr 21, 2025

🤔 这个变动的性质是?

  • 新特性提交
  • 日常 bug 修复
  • 站点、文档改进
  • 演示代码改进
  • 组件样式/交互改进
  • TypeScript 定义更新
  • 包体积优化
  • 性能优化
  • 功能增强
  • 国际化改进
  • 重构
  • 代码风格优化
  • 测试用例
  • 分支合并
  • 其他改动(是关于什么的改动?)

🔗 相关 Issue

💡 需求背景和解决方案

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项⚠️

  • 文档已补充或无须补充
  • 代码演示已提供或无须提供
  • TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
  • fork仓库代码是否为最新避免文件冲突
  • Files changed 没有 package.json lock 等无关文件

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • 修复了选择器组件无法正确处理值为 0 的选项的问题,现在可以正确选择和显示值为 0 的选项。
    • 优化了 3D 效果选择器的渲染,提升了列表项的稳定性和性能。
    • 改进了选择器中值的空状态判断,增强了选择逻辑的准确性。

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2025

Walkthrough

本次变更主要针对 PickerView 组件及其子组件的渲染和选择逻辑进行了优化。具体包括在 pickerroller 组件的列表渲染中,将 React Fragment 的 key 属性移至外层 Fragment,以提升 React 的元素对比效率;同时在 pickerview 相关组件的 handleSelect 回调中,改用 isEmpty 工具函数替代简单的 falsy 判断,确保对空值的判断更准确,避免误判。其余业务逻辑和导出接口未发生变动。

Changes

文件/路径 变更摘要
src/packages/pickerview/pickerroller.taro.tsx 将列表渲染时的 React Fragment 替换为带 key 的 <React.Fragment>,key 从内层 View 移至 Fragment。
src/packages/pickerview/pickerview.taro.tsx
src/packages/pickerview/pickerview.tsx
在 handleSelect 回调中,将对新值的空判断由简单的 falsy 检查改为调用 isEmpty 工具函数,提升判断准确性。

Suggested reviewers

  • xiaoyatong
  • oasis-cloud

Poem

🐰
代码如风吹柳梢头,
Fragment 加 key 更顺手。
选择零值不再愁,
逻辑清晰无遗漏。
小兔子跳跃来巡游,
组件优化乐悠悠!

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d437b6a and ad80dd6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/packages/pickerview/pickerview.taro.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/packages/pickerview/pickerview.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/packages/pickerview/pickerview.tsx
  • src/packages/pickerview/pickerview.taro.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added action:review This PR needs more reviews (less than 2 approvals) 3.x Target branch 3.x labels Apr 21, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.52%. Comparing base (794a53f) to head (ad80dd6).
Report is 18 commits behind head on feat_v3.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           feat_v3.x    #3192      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      87.19%   86.52%   -0.68%     
=============================================
  Files            279      289      +10     
  Lines          18544    18726     +182     
  Branches        2822     2818       -4     
=============================================
+ Hits           16170    16203      +33     
- Misses          2369     2518     +149     
  Partials           5        5              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@xiaoyatong xiaoyatong merged commit 8876f47 into jdf2e:feat_v3.x Apr 22, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.x Target branch 3.x action:review This PR needs more reviews (less than 2 approvals) size/S

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants