Various important fixes (secret labels, security assumptions, limits, change)#10
Merged
josibake merged 1 commit intojosibake:silent-payments-bipfrom Nov 1, 2023
Merged
Conversation
… change) Hashing a secret into the label, added footnote about worst-case implications of this when forgetting to increment k, explicitly added the 1023 character limit (5115 bytes), toned done wording of safety of collaborative transactions, made change label m=0, clarified the need to scan change label by default
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hashing a secret into the label, added footnote about worst-case implications of this when forgetting to increment k, explicitly added the 1023 character limit (5115 bytes), toned done wording of safety of collaborative transactions, made change label m=0, clarified the need to scan change label by default