Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Okay, I now understand the bridging code a lot better. This PR is only style and returns. No logic or bigger code changes, so it should be pretty safe to merge.
The core reason for the time-to-first-plot problem is this:
We at least have some threads to pull on going forward. |
blegat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2021
blegat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2021
blegat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Style fixes and unification of return types for a small win. This was mainly an excuse for me to read slowly through the code to better understand it.
Before
After
Edit: I'll add that functions who didn't explicitly
returncould have type unstable return types at inference. At run time these were obviously never used, which explains the identical second-time results. It's only an issue on the first run when inference has to attempt to figure out what the return is. A blankreturnlets it figure this out easily.