✨ Rebase to 0.19#59
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <stefan.schimanski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <stefan.schimanski@gmail.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @tnthornton. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kcp-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: tnthornton <2375126+tnthornton@users.noreply.github.com>
c36a414 to
fdc16d3
Compare
|
For some extra context, we started running into trouble with upgrading our k8s dependencies to 0.31.0+ due to the signature change in |
| func NewAPIReader(config *rest.Config, options Options) (Reader, error) { | ||
| return New(config, options) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in this file the last changes are missing, compare KcpClusterDiscoveryCacheSize and MapperWithContext.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Weird, I wonder how I lost that 👀
|
/ok-to-test |
|
@tnthornton: The following tests failed, say
DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Rebased kcp-0.18 on top of kcp-0.19 (currently the branch from upstream).
This is currently needed for two reasons: