Skip to content

Conversation

@lrdcasimir
Copy link

I've patched this to work with remote SMTP servers as well as working on nodes that may not have a FQDN defined. Let me know if you see areas for improvement.

@dmorrison
Copy link

This seems to be addressed in PR 4 (though, not as explicit as you've done here - which may be an advantage).

Also, the part about using name vs fqdn might be overloading this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants