Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2025. It is now read-only.

Fix/domain search#286

Merged
abdheshnayak merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/domain-search
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Fix/domain search#286
abdheshnayak merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/domain-search

Conversation

@abdheshnayak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak merged commit 6cb8315 into main Mar 4, 2024
@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak deleted the fix/domain-search branch March 4, 2024 07:53
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Refactoring

PR Summary: This pull request focuses on refining the domain search functionality within an internal application, specifically by updating filter criteria keys used in the search logic. Additionally, it involves the removal of a constant related to node pool statefulness, indicating a potential change in handling stateful node pools.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Refactoring' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.

General suggestions:

  • Given the changes in filter keys from more generic to specific ones ('metadata.name' to 'domainName' and 'spec.clusterName' to 'clusterName'), it's essential to ensure that the rest of the codebase and any associated documentation are updated to reflect these changes. This helps maintain consistency and avoid confusion.
  • The removal of the 'NodePoolStateful' constant suggests a shift in handling stateful node pools. It would be beneficial to provide a brief explanation in the PR description about the rationale behind this change and its impact on the system. This aids in understanding the broader context of the refactoring and its implications.
  • Considering the nature of the changes, it's crucial to verify that all relevant tests have been updated or added to cover the new search functionality and the removal of the constant. This ensures that the changes do not break existing functionality and that the domain search feature behaves as expected.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

if search != nil {
if search.Text != nil {
filter["metadata.name"] = *search.Text
filter["domainName"] = *search.Text
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): I noticed the change from metadata.name to domainName and spec.clusterName to clusterName in the filter criteria. It's crucial to ensure that tests are updated or added to cover these changes, specifically testing the search functionality with these new filter keys. This would verify that the domain search feature is working as expected with the updated keys. If such tests are not present, I recommend adding them to cover both positive and negative scenarios, including cases where the search text or cluster name is not found.

NodePoolSpecMinCount = "spec.minCount"
NodePoolSpecNodeLabels = "spec.nodeLabels"
NodePoolSpecNodeTaints = "spec.nodeTaints"
NodePoolStateful = "stateful"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): The removal of NodePoolStateful constant suggests a refactoring or a change in the way stateful node pools are handled. It's important to ensure that any tests relying on this constant are reviewed and updated accordingly. If this constant's removal affects any functionality, tests should be added or modified to reflect the new behavior or structure. This ensures that the removal does not introduce regressions or unintended behavior changes.

abdheshnayak added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
* 🐛 Fixed issue with domain entries search
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant