Add the Spec fields to the service schema

[joshuawilson]

Related to #912

Proposed Changes

• This adds the Spec section to the Template section to the Service schema.
• I left out the Metadata section.

Release Note

Updated the Service schema to include the Spec fields.

[knative-prow-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joshuawilson
To complete the pull request process, please assign mattmoor after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @mattmoor in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• config/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #10003 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #10003   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.97%   87.97%           
=======================================
  Files         184      184           
  Lines        8657     8657           
=======================================
  Hits         7616     7616           
  Misses        793      793           
  Partials      248      248           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b0eaeb8...f0f6a31. Read the comment docs.

[markusthoemmes]

Pingeroo, where are we on this one? :)

[joshuawilson]

On hold while working other features. I'll pick it back up next.

[markusthoemmes]

Pingeroo :). Any news @joshuawilson ?

[joshuawilson]

I'm sorry, I haven't had time to get back to this.
If someone wants to take a look and see what is wrong or missing, I would be happy to get the help. I do want to get back to this, I've just been busy on other things.

[markusthoemmes]

Optimistically closing this in favor of #11244