Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR updates ChangesFeature Gate Configuration
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@pkg/cmd/server/start.go`:
- Around line 146-149: The two consecutive calls to flags.Set("feature-gates",
...) overwrite each other so "ServerSideApply=false" is lost; modify the code
that sets feature gates (the flags.Set("feature-gates", ...) calls) to provide
both gates in a single comma-separated value (e.g.
"ServerSideApply=false,WatchList=false") or read the existing feature-gates
value and append ",WatchList=false" before calling flags.Set, ensuring both
gates are present in one flags.Set invocation.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
|
Summary:
|
Signed-off-by: Matthias Bertschy <matthias.bertschy@gmail.com>
|
Summary:
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Summary by CodeRabbit