fix: work around deranged breaking change not labeled as such

[westonpace]

A breaking change was introduced in jhpratt/deranged#18 which was not given a semver bump. As a result we pick it up and it fails the "no lock file" test.

This PR just avoids the try_into entirely since it doesn't seem to be necessary (we only work on 64-bit machines so usize->u64 should be safe).

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.93%. Comparing base (db72d25) to head (65e7167).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3591   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.93%   78.93%           
=======================================
  Files         256      256           
  Lines       96481    96481           
  Branches    96481    96481           
=======================================
+ Hits        76160    76161    +1     
+ Misses      17258    17251    -7     
- Partials     3063     3069    +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	78.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.