Skip to content

docs: clarify that lfx is no-op#11062

Closed
mendonk wants to merge 2 commits into
docs-1.7-releasefrom
docs-lfx-clarify-noop
Closed

docs: clarify that lfx is no-op#11062
mendonk wants to merge 2 commits into
docs-1.7-releasefrom
docs-lfx-clarify-noop

Conversation

@mendonk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mendonk mendonk commented Dec 17, 2025

Preview
Clarify that LFX uses a no-op database interface and does not provide data persistence like the full Langflow application.

@mendonk mendonk self-assigned this Dec 17, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs-lfx-clarify-noop

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Build successful! ✅
Deploying docs draft.
Deploy successful! View draft

@github-actions github-actions Bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation and removed documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Dec 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Dec 17, 2025
@mendonk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

mendonk commented Dec 17, 2025

Don't need for 1.7.

@mendonk mendonk closed this Dec 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants