⚡️ Speed up function apply_tweaks by 15% in PR #12152 (dk/le-558)#12157
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
⚡️ Speed up function apply_tweaks by 15% in PR #12152 (dk/le-558)#12157codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
apply_tweaks by 15% in PR #12152 (dk/le-558)#12157codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The hot loop previously performed `tweak_name in template_data` (line 35 in original) then immediately re-checked `tweak_name in template_data` (line 39) before every indexing operation, causing redundant membership tests and repeated dictionary lookups—`template_data[tweak_name]` appeared 14 times across branches. The optimization hoists `template_data.get(tweak_name)` into a local `entry` variable once per iteration and replaces all subsequent `template_data[tweak_name]` references with direct `entry` accesses, eliminating ~10 dictionary lookups per processed tweak. Line profiler shows the redundant membership check consumed 7.2% of total time (line 35: 658 µs), and subsequent `template_data[tweak_name].get("type", "")` lookups took another 7.2% (line 39: 661 µs); the optimized version collapses these into a single `entry.get("type", "")` call costing 6.3% (line 23: 572 µs). Additionally, `validate_and_repair_json` is bound to the local alias `repair` outside the loop to avoid repeated global lookups (~20 ns per hit, negligible but measurable at scale). No behavior changes; all security checks, field-type logic, and `load_from_db` handling remain identical.
Contributor
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (41.69%) is below the target coverage (60.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dk/le-558 #12157 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 37.33% 37.34%
==========================================
Files 1592 1592
Lines 78289 78290 +1
Branches 11866 11866
==========================================
+ Hits 29233 29237 +4
+ Misses 47387 47384 -3
Partials 1669 1669
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #12152
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
dk/le-558.📄 15% (0.15x) speedup for
apply_tweaksinsrc/backend/base/langflow/processing/process.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.16 milliseconds→1.01 milliseconds(best of142runs)📝 Explanation and details
The hot loop previously performed
tweak_name in template_data(line 35 in original) then immediately re-checkedtweak_name in template_data(line 39) before every indexing operation, causing redundant membership tests and repeated dictionary lookups—template_data[tweak_name]appeared 14 times across branches. The optimization hoiststemplate_data.get(tweak_name)into a localentryvariable once per iteration and replaces all subsequenttemplate_data[tweak_name]references with directentryaccesses, eliminating ~10 dictionary lookups per processed tweak. Line profiler shows the redundant membership check consumed 7.2% of total time (line 35: 658 µs), and subsequenttemplate_data[tweak_name].get("type", "")lookups took another 7.2% (line 39: 661 µs); the optimized version collapses these into a singleentry.get("type", "")call costing 6.3% (line 23: 572 µs). Additionally,validate_and_repair_jsonis bound to the local aliasrepairoutside the loop to avoid repeated global lookups (~20 ns per hit, negligible but measurable at scale). No behavior changes; all security checks, field-type logic, andload_from_dbhandling remain identical.✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr12152-2026-03-11T20.46.04and push.