Skip to content

ci: fix uv cache in CI workflows#8319

Merged
ogabrielluiz merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
improve-uv-caching
Jun 3, 2025
Merged

ci: fix uv cache in CI workflows#8319
ogabrielluiz merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
improve-uv-caching

Conversation

@ogabrielluiz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz commented Jun 2, 2025

Eliminate the UV_CACHE_DIR environment variable and the associated cache restoration step from GitHub workflows to streamline the CI process.

The setup-uv action cached with one key but we looked up a different format, causing cache misses.
Example:

cache saved with the key: setup-uv-1-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-0.7.9-2b8ee67a007765037fec8b697d12ed35e766c5e388e33f436dac807b058ccc6b
Cache not found for input keys: uv-Linux-2b8ee67a007765037fec8b697d12ed35e766c5e388e33f436dac807b058ccc6b, uv-Linux-2b8ee67a007765037fec8b697d12ed35e766c5e388e33f436dac807b058ccc6b, uv-Linux

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed caching steps and related environment variables for uv cache from GitHub Actions workflows and composite actions.
  • New Features
    • Added a new "benchmark" test marker to the pytest configuration for improved test categorization.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 2, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

This change removes the use of the UV_CACHE_DIR environment variable and the related cache restoration step for the /tmp/.uv-cache directory from several GitHub Actions workflows and a composite action. Additionally, a new pytest marker "benchmark" was added to the pytest configuration. No other workflow steps or logic were modified.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/actions/setup-uv/action.yml Removed the "Restore uv cache" step using actions/cache@v4.
.github/workflows/python_test.yml
.github/workflows/store_pytest_durations.yml
.github/workflows/typescript_test.yml
Removed UV_CACHE_DIR environment variable from job configurations.
pyproject.toml Added "benchmark" marker to pytest configuration.

Suggested labels

size:M, ignore-for-release

Suggested reviewers

  • edwinjosechittilappilly
    """

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a44d92 and bb64f1e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • pyproject.toml

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 2, 2025
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz changed the title ci: Remove cache restoration from workflows ci: fix uv cache in CI workflows Jun 2, 2025
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz enabled auto-merge June 2, 2025 14:46
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz requested a review from mfortman11 June 2, 2025 21:06
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jun 2, 2025
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz disabled auto-merge June 3, 2025 12:50
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz merged commit bdc7587 into main Jun 3, 2025
31 of 32 checks passed
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz deleted the improve-uv-caching branch June 3, 2025 12:50
ogabrielluiz added a commit to bkatya2001/langflow that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant