docs(readme): add Attendance to Features table#460
docs(readme): add Attendance to Features table#460liangshuo-1 merged 2 commits intolarksuite:mainfrom
Conversation
The attendance module was shipped in v1.0.9 but was missing from the README Features table. Add it so users can discover the capability. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated English and Chinese READMEs: incremented AI Agent Skills (21→22) and business domains (13→14), added an "Attendance" / “考勤打卡” row to the features table describing personal attendance check-in queries, and added a Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Greptile SummaryThis PR adds the Attendance ( Confidence Score: 5/5
Important Files Changed
Flowchart%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[README Features Table] --> B[Added: 🕐 Attendance row]
C[README Agent Skills Table] --> D[Added: lark-attendance row]
E[Skill count: 21 → 22] --> F[Updated in intro & Why section]
G[Domain count: 13 → 14] --> H[Updated in Why section]
B & D & F & H --> I[README.md ✅]
B & D & F & H --> J[README.zh.md ✅]
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs(readme): add lark-attendance to Age..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 39: The README's summary count is out of date after adding the
"Attendance" row to the Features table; update the business-domain count
referenced on Line 16 from "13 business domains" to "14 business domains" so it
matches the Features table that now includes the Attendance category.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
…unts - Add lark-attendance to Agent Skills table in both EN and ZH READMEs - Add Attendance to ZH Features table - Update skill count 21 → 22 and domain count 13 → 14 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.zh.md (1)
9-9: 可选:收紧 Line 9 的数量词表达以减少歧义句子可读性不错,但“覆盖…业务域,提供 200+ 命令及 22 个 Skills”在中文里有轻微修饰范围歧义。可考虑拆句或补主语,避免读者误读数量对应关系。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.zh.md` at line 9, 调整第9行描述中数量词表达以消除歧义:定位包含“覆盖消息、文档、多维表格...核心业务域,提供 200+ 命令及 22 个 AI Agent Skills”的句子,改为拆成两句或在句中补足主语/限定关系,明确“200+ 命令”和“22 个 AI Agent Skills”分别指代的范围(例如“覆盖...核心业务域。提供 200+ 命令;另有 22 个 AI Agent Skills”或“覆盖...核心业务域,且为这些域提供 200+ 命令,另配 22 个 AI Agent Skills”),以消除数量修饰范围的歧义并保持原意。
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.zh.md`:
- Line 9: 调整第9行描述中数量词表达以消除歧义:定位包含“覆盖消息、文档、多维表格...核心业务域,提供 200+ 命令及 22 个 AI Agent
Skills”的句子,改为拆成两句或在句中补足主语/限定关系,明确“200+ 命令”和“22 个 AI Agent
Skills”分别指代的范围(例如“覆盖...核心业务域。提供 200+ 命令;另有 22 个 AI Agent
Skills”或“覆盖...核心业务域,且为这些域提供 200+ 命令,另配 22 个 AI Agent Skills”),以消除数量修饰范围的歧义并保持原意。
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 6f240696-7060-4747-9e92-39c09aadd4de
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mdREADME.zh.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- README.md
* docs(readme): add lark-attendance to Agent Skills table and update counts - Add lark-attendance to Agent Skills table in both EN and ZH READMEs - Add Attendance to ZH Features table - Update skill count 21 → 22 and domain count 13 → 14
Summary
Test plan
attendancecommand capabilitiesSummary by CodeRabbit