Conversation
MaxHuang22
added
enhancement
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant CLI as Client (lark CLI)
participant API as Server (Open API)
participant STDERR as stderr (debugLogResponse)
participant STDOUT as stdout (normal output)
CLI->>API: HTTP request (api get ...)
API-->>CLI: HTTP response (headers incl. x-request-id, body)
CLI->>STDOUT: write main response (JSON or filtered)
CLI->>STDERR: debugLogResponse({log_id: header, response: body, timestamp: UTC})
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
github-actions
Bot
added
size/L
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar.event:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar.event%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit ad45873.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo ad45873a6c4042eba2b40e4fb3895875a58c51c8:docs/superpowers/result.md:lark-bot-app-id:44 >> .gitleaksignore
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit ad45873.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo ad45873a6c4042eba2b40e4fb3895875a58c51c8:docs/superpowers/result.md:lark-bot-app-id:97 >> .gitleaksignore
| --- PASS: TestIM_ChatsGetWorkflow/get_chat_info (0.43s) | ||
| === RUN TestIM_ChatsLinkWorkflow | ||
| === RUN TestIM_ChatsLinkWorkflow/get_chat_share_link | ||
| chat_workflow_test.go:122: Generated share link: https://applink.feishu.cn/client/chat/chatter/add_by_link?link_token=f5ar8bb8-58b6-4d36-9de1-744b79f61bd8 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id generic-api-key in commit ad45873.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo ad45873a6c4042eba2b40e4fb3895875a58c51c8:docs/superpowers/detail_info/e2e.log:generic-api-key:322 >> .gitleaksignore
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar.event:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar.event%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit ad45873.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo ad45873a6c4042eba2b40e4fb3895875a58c51c8:docs/superpowers/detail_info/e2e.log:lark-bot-app-id:127 >> .gitleaksignore
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit ad45873.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo ad45873a6c4042eba2b40e4fb3895875a58c51c8:docs/superpowers/detail_info/e2e.log:lark-bot-app-id:176 >> .gitleaksignore
ad45873 to
e6d5cba
Compare
🚀 PR Preview Install Guide🧰 CLI updatenpm i -g https://pkg.pr.new/larksuite/cli/@larksuite/cli@5e38d7da45e4b45944e7dde2e13fd2851b4a96d9🧩 Skill updatenpx skills add larksuite/cli#feat/meta-api-debug -y -g |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
cmd/api/api.go (2)
289-327:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorPaginated debug emits a single aggregated record with empty
log_id, despite the spec calling for per-page records.The design doc (
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-design.md§"分页请求") and the E2E coverage doc both state that each page should produce its own debug record carrying that page'sx-request-id. The current implementation callsdebugLogResponse(errOut, "", result)once afterStreamPages/PaginateAllfinish, losing per-pagelog_identirely. Additionally:
- On the
StreamPages/PaginateAllerror paths (lines 295–297, 313–315), no debug record is emitted even when some pages did succeed — this contradicts "无论成功还是失败，都输出调试信息".- Using an empty string for
log_idmakes the record less useful and inconsistent with the single-page path.Recommended: either plumb a per-page debug hook through
StreamPages/PaginateAll(exposing raw header + body), or at minimum update the spec and coverage docs to match the implemented aggregated behavior and its known limitation (already noted in the plan doc).🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@cmd/api/api.go` around lines 289 - 327, The paginated paths call debugLogResponse once with an empty log_id after StreamPages/PaginateAll complete, losing per-page x-request-id and failing to emit debug records on partial failures; change the implementation so that when opts.Debug is set you call debugLogResponse for each page as it arrives inside ac.StreamPages's page callback (and similarly within any per-page callback/hook for ac.PaginateAll) passing the page body and the page's x-request-id extracted from response headers, and also ensure that on error paths you still emit debug records for any pages that succeeded before failure (i.e., emit per-page debug records as pages are processed rather than only after final success/failure).
282-287:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major
--debugis silently dropped when combined with--page-all --jq.In the
jqExpr != ""branch,PaginateWithJqhandles everything inline anddebugLogResponseis never invoked, solark api ... --page-all --jq '.data' --debugproduces no debug records on stderr. This contradicts the design doc's statement that--debugand--jqare independent (stderr debug unaffected by jq) and the coverage doc's WithJq scenario expectations. At minimum, emit one aggregated debug record afterPaginateWithJqcompletes (mirroring the other two branches), or document the gap.♻️ Suggested alignment
if jqExpr != "" { - if err := client.PaginateWithJq(ctx, ac, request, jqExpr, out, pagOpts, client.CheckLarkResponse); err != nil { + if err := client.PaginateWithJq(ctx, ac, request, jqExpr, out, pagOpts, client.CheckLarkResponse); err != nil { return output.MarkRaw(err) } + // Note: PaginateWithJq does not expose the aggregated result; --debug + // is currently a no-op on this path. Document or surface a record. return nil }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@cmd/api/api.go` around lines 282 - 287, The jq branch drops debug output: after client.PaginateWithJq returns successfully in the jqExpr != "" branch, call the same debugLogResponse invocation used in the other branches (i.e., pass the same auth/context and output values those branches use) so a single aggregated debug record is emitted when --debug is set; ensure you only call debugLogResponse on nil error (mirror the other branches' behavior) and reuse variables present in this scope (ac, request/response/out/context) to locate the exact call site and arguments.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
cmd/api/api_test.go (1)
1042-1051: Checkjson.Unmarshalerrors in the independence test.Nit:
json.Unmarshalreturn values are discarded on lines 1043–1044. If future changes break the output format, this test would still pass thelog_idassertions against zero-valued maps only when both unmarshals silently fail — but if just one fails and the other populates correctly, results will be misleading. Consider checking the errors to keep the signal clean.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@cmd/api/api_test.go` around lines 1042 - 1051, The json.Unmarshal calls for out1/out2 discard errors; update the test around variables result1 and result2 to capture and check the returned errors from json.Unmarshal for both out1 and out2 and fail the test (use t.Fatalf or t.Errorf) if unmarshalling fails before asserting on result1["log_id"] and result2["log_id"], so any malformed JSON is reported rather than silently producing zero-valued maps.tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go (3)
110-119: Weak negative assertion inTestDebugFlag_WithoutFlag.The current check only asserts that the entire trimmed stderr fails to parse as a single JSON object. If stderr is empty (the common case without
--debug) theifblock is skipped entirely and nothing is asserted; if stderr happens to contain any JSON-ish warning line it will fail for the wrong reason. Consider asserting directly on the absence of the debug record's signature — e.g., that no non-empty line parses into a map containing all three oflog_id,response, andtimestamp— which more precisely encodes the intent "no debug record was emitted".♻️ Suggested tightening
- trimmedStderr := strings.TrimSpace(result.Stderr) - if trimmedStderr != "" { - // If stderr has content, verify it's not the debug JSON record - var debugRecord map[string]interface{} - err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(trimmedStderr), &debugRecord) - assert.Error(t, err, "stderr without --debug should not be valid debug JSON") - } + for _, line := range strings.Split(strings.TrimSpace(result.Stderr), "\n") { + if strings.TrimSpace(line) == "" { + continue + } + var rec map[string]interface{} + if json.Unmarshal([]byte(line), &rec) != nil { + continue + } + _, hasLog := rec["log_id"] + _, hasResp := rec["response"] + _, hasTs := rec["timestamp"] + assert.False(t, hasLog && hasResp && hasTs, + "stderr should not contain a debug record without --debug: %s", line) + }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go` around lines 110 - 119, The test TestDebugFlag_WithoutFlag uses a weak assertion; change it to split trimmedStderr into lines and for each non-empty line attempt to json.Unmarshal into a map (referencing trimmedStderr and debugRecord) and assert that no parsed map contains all three keys "log_id", "response", and "timestamp"; this directly verifies that no debug record was emitted even if other JSON-like warnings exist or stderr is empty.
276-312: Pagination assertion is too lax to actually validate per-page debug emission.With
--page-all --page-limit 2the PR claims one debug record is emitted per page from the aggregated pagination path, so this test is the main guardrail that pagination actually emits a record per page. Asserting onlyvalidRecords > 0would still pass if a regression collapsed emission to a single record. Consider assertingvalidRecords >= 2(or the exact expected count) to catch that class of regression.- require.Greater(t, validRecords, 0, "should have at least 1 debug JSON record from pagination") + require.GreaterOrEqual(t, validRecords, 2, + "paginated request with --page-limit 2 should emit a debug record per page")🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go` around lines 276 - 312, The test debug_with_page_all_multiple_records currently only asserts validRecords > 0 which won't catch regressions that collapse per-page debug emission; update the final assertion to require that validRecords is at least 2 (matching the --page-limit 2) by replacing the require.Greater(t, validRecords, 0, ...) with something like require.GreaterOrEqual(t, validRecords, 2, "should have at least 2 debug JSON records for two pages") so the test verifies one debug record per page when using --page-all and --page-limit 2.
37-38: Parse trimmed stderr rather than rawresult.Stderr.
TestDebugFlag_SinglePageRequest(line 37) andTestDebugFlag_LogIdFromHeader(line 260) unmarshalresult.Stderrdirectly.encoding/jsontolerates trailing whitespace but any stray leading/trailing newline or incidental log line from the harness will make these tests fail in a confusing way, whileTestDebugFlag_StderrLineFormatalready uses the trim-and-split pattern. For consistency and robustness, parsestrings.TrimSpace(result.Stderr)(or the first non-empty line) in these two tests as well.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go` around lines 37 - 38, Both TestDebugFlag_SinglePageRequest and TestDebugFlag_LogIdFromHeader currently call json.Unmarshal on raw result.Stderr which can fail if there are stray whitespace/newlines or harness output; update those tests to parse the trimmed stderr instead by using strings.TrimSpace(result.Stderr) (or split and take the first non-empty line) before json.Unmarshal into debugRecord so the unmarshal uses a clean JSON string; ensure you update the json.Unmarshal call sites that reference result.Stderr and keep the require.NoError assertions as-is.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@cmd/api/api.go`:
- Around line 249-257: The current code calls client.ParseJSONResponse and
discards its error, causing debugLogResponse to show "response": null on parse
failures; change the logic in the block that uses client.IsJSONContentType to
capture the (parsedResp, err) from client.ParseJSONResponse, and if err is
non-nil then call debugLogResponse with a map containing the raw_body
(string(resp.RawBody)) and a parse_error field (err.Error()) as fallback,
otherwise pass the parsedResp; keep debugLogResponse, logID, f.IOStreams.ErrOut
and resp.RawBody as the referenced symbols.
In `@docs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_16_contact_me_e2e_coverage.md`:
- Line 26: The claim sentence "None. All 11 scenarios from the verify plan are
covered by tests." is unsupported and must be revised: replace that absolute
statement with a factual, verifiable summary (e.g., "Tests currently cover X of
11 scenarios; remaining gaps: ...") or list the specific scenario IDs covered,
and apply the same edit to the identical claim at the other occurrence; locate
the exact text string to find where to update in the document and ensure the
revised wording reflects actual implemented tests rather than an absolute "no
uncovered scenarios" assertion.
- Around line 12-23: The coverage table lists synthetic TestContactMe_* names
that don't match real tests; replace the table with the actual test/subtest
names and file references found in
tests/cli_e2e/contact/contact_shortcut_test.go (e.g., use the real Go test
function names and any subtest strings used via t.Run, plus the source file path
and line or test description) so each row maps to verifiable tests, and update
expected outputs/exit codes to match those real tests' behavior.
- Around line 4-6: The coverage numbers in the markdown are incorrect: update
the three lines "Scenarios in verify plan: 11", "Covered: 11", and "Coverage:
100%" to reflect the actual implemented tests (or add the missing E2E tests
first); inspect tests/cli_e2e/contact/contact_shortcut_test.go (which currently
contains one top-level test and two sub-tests) and set "Scenarios in verify
plan" to the total declared scenarios, "Covered" to the count actually
implemented, and recalculate "Coverage" as Covered/Scenarios (percentage) so the
document matches the real test inventory.
In `@docs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_e2e_coverage.md`:
- Around line 69-73: The test/doc mismatch is caused by apiPaginate calling
debugLogResponse only once with the aggregated result (empty log_id) after
StreamPages/PaginateAll returns; change apiPaginate to emit a debug JSON per
page by wiring a page callback into StreamPages/PaginateAll that receives the
raw page response/headers and calls debugLogResponse for each page (populating
log_id/timestamp/response per page) so stderr contains one valid JSON line per
page as asserted by the PagedRequest coverage; update any call sites of
StreamPages/PaginateAll in cmd/api/api.go to pass the new callback signature and
ensure debugLogResponse can accept the per-page payload (or adjust its signature
accordingly).
In `@docs/superpowers/result.md`:
- Around line 1-131: The file documents transient calendar E2E failures
unrelated to this PR (see headings "E2E 失败明细" and test blocks for
TestCalendar_CreateEvent and TestCalendar_ManageCalendar) and also has three
fenced output blocks missing a language tag; remove or revert the commit that
adds these unrelated failure reports (or move them to CI/issue tracker) so the
PR only contains the --debug change, and in the remaining markdown add a
language identifier (use "text") to the three fenced code blocks that follow the
"输出：" lines (the blocks containing stdout/stderr JSON) so they render correctly
(i.e., change ``` to ```text for those three blocks).
In `@docs/superpowers/verify_results/e2e_result.md`:
- Around line 1-480: Summary: The committed E2E failure report documents tests
for unimplemented contact flags (--format, --jq, --dry-run, --as) that are
unrelated to this PR and also contains fenced code blocks missing language
specifiers. Fix: remove or revert this results file commit
(docs/superpowers/verify_results/e2e_result.md) from the PR or update it to not
claim failures for TestContactMe_* tests that expect non-existent flags
(--format, --jq, --dry-run, --as); if keeping the file, clearly mark these as
outdated/irrelevant or move to a local/CI-only artifact instead of committing;
and correct markdown by adding the language specifier "text" to all ten failing
output code fences (the fenced blocks showing "输出：" for each TestContactMe_*
section) so each ``` becomes ```text.
In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go`:
- Around line 65-95: The test named TestDebugFlag_PostRequest (and its t.Run
"post_with_debug_outputs_response_to_stderr") is misleading because it runs
clie2e.RunCmd with a GET; either rename the test and subtest to reflect a
GET/check-for-debug-JSON (e.g., TestDebugFlag_GetReturnsDebugJSON or
TestDebugFlag_FirstLineIsJSON) or change the clie2e.RunCmd Args to execute a
real POST against a safe endpoint; update the test name, t.Run string, and
related comment consistently so TestDebugFlag_PostRequest no longer
misrepresents the executed command.
In `@tests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml`:
- Around line 9-11: The eval case lark_cli_2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_002
conflicts with the current implementation: apiPaginate (in cmd/api/api.go)
produces a single aggregated debug record with an empty log_id rather than
per-page debug records with distinct x-request-id values; either update
apiPaginate to emit a debug log for each page containing that page's
x-request-id and proper log_id, or change the YAML expectation to assert the
aggregated behavior (single stderr record with empty log_id and aggregated
x-request-ids) so tests match the implementation—pick one and make the
corresponding change consistently (modify apiPaginate to loop and log per page
or adjust the test case text and expectations to describe aggregated logging).
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@cmd/api/api.go`:
- Around line 289-327: The paginated paths call debugLogResponse once with an
empty log_id after StreamPages/PaginateAll complete, losing per-page
x-request-id and failing to emit debug records on partial failures; change the
implementation so that when opts.Debug is set you call debugLogResponse for each
page as it arrives inside ac.StreamPages's page callback (and similarly within
any per-page callback/hook for ac.PaginateAll) passing the page body and the
page's x-request-id extracted from response headers, and also ensure that on
error paths you still emit debug records for any pages that succeeded before
failure (i.e., emit per-page debug records as pages are processed rather than
only after final success/failure).
- Around line 282-287: The jq branch drops debug output: after
client.PaginateWithJq returns successfully in the jqExpr != "" branch, call the
same debugLogResponse invocation used in the other branches (i.e., pass the same
auth/context and output values those branches use) so a single aggregated debug
record is emitted when --debug is set; ensure you only call debugLogResponse on
nil error (mirror the other branches' behavior) and reuse variables present in
this scope (ac, request/response/out/context) to locate the exact call site and
arguments.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@cmd/api/api_test.go`:
- Around line 1042-1051: The json.Unmarshal calls for out1/out2 discard errors;
update the test around variables result1 and result2 to capture and check the
returned errors from json.Unmarshal for both out1 and out2 and fail the test
(use t.Fatalf or t.Errorf) if unmarshalling fails before asserting on
result1["log_id"] and result2["log_id"], so any malformed JSON is reported
rather than silently producing zero-valued maps.
In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go`:
- Around line 110-119: The test TestDebugFlag_WithoutFlag uses a weak assertion;
change it to split trimmedStderr into lines and for each non-empty line attempt
to json.Unmarshal into a map (referencing trimmedStderr and debugRecord) and
assert that no parsed map contains all three keys "log_id", "response", and
"timestamp"; this directly verifies that no debug record was emitted even if
other JSON-like warnings exist or stderr is empty.
- Around line 276-312: The test debug_with_page_all_multiple_records currently
only asserts validRecords > 0 which won't catch regressions that collapse
per-page debug emission; update the final assertion to require that validRecords
is at least 2 (matching the --page-limit 2) by replacing the require.Greater(t,
validRecords, 0, ...) with something like require.GreaterOrEqual(t,
validRecords, 2, "should have at least 2 debug JSON records for two pages") so
the test verifies one debug record per page when using --page-all and
--page-limit 2.
- Around line 37-38: Both TestDebugFlag_SinglePageRequest and
TestDebugFlag_LogIdFromHeader currently call json.Unmarshal on raw result.Stderr
which can fail if there are stray whitespace/newlines or harness output; update
those tests to parse the trimmed stderr instead by using
strings.TrimSpace(result.Stderr) (or split and take the first non-empty line)
before json.Unmarshal into debugRecord so the unmarshal uses a clean JSON
string; ensure you update the json.Unmarshal call sites that reference
result.Stderr and keep the require.NoError assertions as-is.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 42e16023-86fe-4c58-a33a-f680c13bc4c3
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (8)
docs/superpowers/aggregated_evals.csvis excluded by!**/*.csvdocs/superpowers/detail_info/e2e.logis excluded by!**/*.logdocs/superpowers/detail_info/eval.logis excluded by!**/*.logdocs/superpowers/result.csvis excluded by!**/*.csvdocs/superpowers/verify_results/aggregated_evals.csvis excluded by!**/*.csvdocs/superpowers/verify_results/detail_info/e2e.logis excluded by!**/*.logdocs/superpowers/verify_results/detail_info/eval.logis excluded by!**/*.logdocs/superpowers/verify_results/result.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.gitignorecmd/api/api.gocmd/api/api_test.godocs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_16_contact_me_e2e_coverage.mddocs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_e2e_coverage.mddocs/superpowers/harness-state.mddocs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-plan.mddocs/superpowers/result.mddocs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-design.mddocs/superpowers/verify_results/e2e_result.mddocs/superpowers/verify_results/eval_result.mdtests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.gotests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .gitignore
| - Scenarios in verify plan: 11 | ||
| - Covered: 11 | ||
| - Coverage: 100% |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Coverage metrics appear overstated vs existing E2E inventory.
Line 4-Line 6 claims 11/11 scenarios covered, but the provided E2E test context only shows tests/cli_e2e/contact/contact_shortcut_test.go with a single top-level test and two sub-tests. Please update these numbers to match actual implemented tests (or add the missing tests first).
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_16_contact_me_e2e_coverage.md` around lines
4 - 6, The coverage numbers in the markdown are incorrect: update the three
lines "Scenarios in verify plan: 11", "Covered: 11", and "Coverage: 100%" to
reflect the actual implemented tests (or add the missing E2E tests first);
inspect tests/cli_e2e/contact/contact_shortcut_test.go (which currently contains
one top-level test and two sub-tests) and set "Scenarios in verify plan" to the
total declared scenarios, "Covered" to the count actually implemented, and
recalculate "Coverage" as Covered/Scenarios (percentage) so the document matches
the real test inventory.
| | TestContactMe_HappyPath_TableFormat | Default table output | stdout contains table, no stderr, exit 0 | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_HappyPath_JSONFormat | JSON format output | stdout valid JSON, user object with 6 fields (open_id, name, union_id, email, phone, avatar_url), exit 0 | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqOpenID | jq filtering for open_id | open_id as scalar (raw, unquoted), exit 0 | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqEmail | jq filtering for email | email as scalar (raw, unquoted), exit 0 | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_HappyPath_CSVFormat | CSV format output | 2+ lines (headers + data), expected headers present, exit 0 | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_HappyPath_NDJSONFormat | NDJSON format output | one JSON line, valid JSON, user object present, exit 0 | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_HappyPath_DryRun | Dry-run shows API endpoint | stdout contains authen/user_info reference, exit 0 | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_ErrorCase_BotIdentityRejected | Bot rejection | exit 2, stderr valid JSON, mentions user/identity/bot, stdout empty | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidJqExpression | Invalid jq syntax | exit 1, stderr contains error/syntax/compile, stdout empty/minimal | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidFormatValue | Invalid format flag | exit 2, stderr valid JSON, mentions valid formats, stdout empty | none | | ||
| | TestContactMe_ErrorCase_UnknownFlag | Unknown flag error | exit 2, stderr mentions unknown/flag/unrecognized, stdout empty | none | | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test function table is not traceable to real test files.
The listed TestContactMe_* functions cannot be mapped to the provided E2E test source (tests/cli_e2e/contact/contact_shortcut_test.go). Please replace this table with actual test function names/subtests and file references so coverage claims are verifiable.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_16_contact_me_e2e_coverage.md` around lines
12 - 23, The coverage table lists synthetic TestContactMe_* names that don't
match real tests; replace the table with the actual test/subtest names and file
references found in tests/cli_e2e/contact/contact_shortcut_test.go (e.g., use
the real Go test function names and any subtest strings used via t.Run, plus the
source file path and line or test description) so each row maps to verifiable
tests, and update expected outputs/exit codes to match those real tests'
behavior.
|
|
||
| ## Uncovered Scenarios | ||
|
|
||
| None. All 11 scenarios from the verify plan are covered by tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
“No uncovered scenarios” claim is currently unsupported.
Given the mismatch between documented and visible E2E tests, these absolute statements should be revised to reflect actual implemented coverage.
Also applies to: 57-57
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_16_contact_me_e2e_coverage.md` at line 26,
The claim sentence "None. All 11 scenarios from the verify plan are covered by
tests." is unsupported and must be revised: replace that absolute statement with
a factual, verifiable summary (e.g., "Tests currently cover X of 11 scenarios;
remaining gaps: ...") or list the specific scenario IDs covered, and apply the
same edit to the identical claim at the other occurrence; locate the exact text
string to find where to update in the document and ensure the revised wording
reflects actual implemented tests rather than an absolute "no uncovered
scenarios" assertion.
| ### 9. PagedRequest (boundary) | ||
| - Calls `api get /open-apis/contact/v3/users --page-all --page-limit 2 --debug` | ||
| - Expects: exit code 0, stderr has multiple debug JSON lines (one per page) | ||
| - Key assertion: each line is valid JSON with log_id/response/timestamp | ||
| - Confirms spec: "对于每一页的请求，输出一条调试 JSON 到 stderr" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Coverage doc claims per-page debug records, but implementation emits a single aggregated record.
Scenario 9 (PagedRequest) asserts "stderr has multiple debug JSON lines (one per page)" and "each line is valid JSON with log_id/response/timestamp" — confirming the spec's "对于每一页的请求，输出一条调试 JSON 到 stderr". However, apiPaginate in cmd/api/api.go calls debugLogResponse only once after StreamPages/PaginateAll returns, passing the aggregated result with an empty log_id. Either the implementation needs to emit per-page records (via a page callback that also exposes the raw response/header) or this coverage doc and the design spec need to be updated to reflect the known limitation documented in the plan (docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-plan.md, "Known Limitations" §1).
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/superpowers/coverage/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_e2e_coverage.md` around
lines 69 - 73, The test/doc mismatch is caused by apiPaginate calling
debugLogResponse only once with the aggregated result (empty log_id) after
StreamPages/PaginateAll returns; change apiPaginate to emit a debug JSON per
page by wiring a page callback into StreamPages/PaginateAll that receives the
raw page response/headers and calls debugLogResponse for each page (populating
log_id/timestamp/response per page) so stderr contains one valid JSON line per
page as asserted by the PagedRequest coverage; update any call sites of
StreamPages/PaginateAll in cmd/api/api.go to pass the new callback signature and
ensure debugLogResponse can accept the per-page payload (or adjust its signature
accordingly).
| # 本地沙箱评测结果 | ||
|
|
||
| ## 概要 | ||
| - 时间：2026-04-16 06:15 | ||
| - lark-cli commit：unknown | ||
| - EVAL_AGENT：claudecode | ||
| - E2E：31 passed / 2 failed (exit=1) | ||
| - skillave eval：5 passed / 0 failed (exit=0) | ||
| - 整体：❌ FAIL | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## E2E 失败明细 | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestCalendar_CreateEvent | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestCalendar_CreateEvent' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestCalendar_CreateEvent | ||
| calendar_create_event_test.go:46: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_create_event_test.go:46 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_CreateEvent/create_event_with_shortcut | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| { | ||
| "ok": false, | ||
| "identity": "bot", | ||
| "error": { | ||
| "type": "permission", | ||
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar.event:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar.event%3Acreate" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| calendar_create_event_test.go:47: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:329 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_create_event_test.go:47 | ||
| Error: stdout status key not found; expected ok or code | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_CreateEvent/create_event_with_shortcut | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
| calendar_create_event_test.go:50: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_create_event_test.go:50 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_CreateEvent/create_event_with_shortcut | ||
| calendar_create_event_test.go:54: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_create_event_test.go:54 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_CreateEvent/verify_event_created | ||
| calendar_create_event_test.go:73: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_create_event_test.go:73 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_CreateEvent/delete_event | ||
| --- FAIL: TestCalendar_CreateEvent (1.84s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestCalendar_ManageCalendar' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestCalendar_ManageCalendar | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:55: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:55 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/create_calendar | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| { | ||
| "ok": false, | ||
| "identity": "bot", | ||
| "error": { | ||
| "type": "permission", | ||
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar%3Acreate" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:56: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:329 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:56 | ||
| Error: stdout status key not found; expected ok or code | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/create_calendar | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:59: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:59 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/create_calendar | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:63: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:63 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/get_created_calendar | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:80: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:80 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/find_created_calendar_in_list | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:92: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:92 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/update_calendar | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:109: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:109 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/verify_updated_calendar | ||
| calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:124: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/calendar/calendar_manage_calendar_test.go:124 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar/delete_calendar | ||
| --- FAIL: TestCalendar_ManageCalendar (2.73s) | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Question: Why are unrelated test failure reports being committed?
This file documents calendar E2E test failures from 2026-04-16, but:
-
Unrelated to PR scope: This PR adds a
--debugflag to thelark apicommand. These failures are from calendar tests, which are unrelated to the changes. -
Contradicts PR objectives: The PR description states "local-eval (E2E 9/9): passed", but this file documents 2 failed tests.
-
Configuration issue, not code defect: Both failures show error code 99991672 (App scope not enabled), indicating the test environment lacks required permissions (
calendar:calendar.event:createandcalendar:calendar:create). This is a test setup issue, not a code regression. -
Repository hygiene: Test failure reports are typically transient artifacts, not permanent documentation. Consider whether this belongs in the repository or should be tracked elsewhere (CI logs, issue tracker, internal docs).
Fix markdown formatting.
The fenced code blocks at lines 24, 59, and 104 should specify a language identifier for proper rendering and accessibility.
📝 Proposed fix
-**输出：**
-```
+**输出：**
+```textApply this pattern to all three output blocks (lines 24, 59, 104).
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.0)
[warning] 24-24: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 59-59: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 104-104: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/superpowers/result.md` around lines 1 - 131, The file documents
transient calendar E2E failures unrelated to this PR (see headings "E2E 失败明细"
and test blocks for TestCalendar_CreateEvent and TestCalendar_ManageCalendar)
and also has three fenced output blocks missing a language tag; remove or revert
the commit that adds these unrelated failure reports (or move them to CI/issue
tracker) so the PR only contains the --debug change, and in the remaining
markdown add a language identifier (use "text") to the three fenced code blocks
that follow the "输出：" lines (the blocks containing stdout/stderr JSON) so they
render correctly (i.e., change ``` to ```text for those three blocks).
| # E2E 测试 结果 | ||
|
|
||
| ## 概要 | ||
| - 时间：2026-04-16 11:34 | ||
| - lark-cli commit：unknown | ||
| - EVAL_AGENT：claudecode | ||
| - 测试通过：7 | ||
| - 测试失败：10 | ||
| - 整体：❌ FAIL | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## 失败明细 | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_TableFormat | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_HappyPath_TableFormat' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_HappyPath_TableFormat | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:32: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:32 | ||
| Error: Should be true | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_TableFormat | ||
| Messages: table output should contain expected headers or data, stdout: | ||
| Contacts operations | ||
|
|
||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_TableFormat (0.03s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JSONFormat | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_HappyPath_JSONFormat' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_HappyPath_JSONFormat | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:47: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:47 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JSONFormat | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --format | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:50: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:50 | ||
| Error: Should be true | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JSONFormat | ||
| Messages: stdout should be valid JSON: | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JSONFormat (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqOpenID | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqOpenID' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqOpenID | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:77: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:77 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqOpenID | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --jq | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:81: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:81 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqOpenID | ||
| Messages: open_id should not be empty | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqOpenID (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqEmail | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqEmail' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqEmail | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:97: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:97 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqEmail | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --jq | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:101: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:101 | ||
| Error: Should NOT be empty, but was | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqEmail | ||
| Messages: email should not be empty | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_JqEmail (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_CSVFormat | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_HappyPath_CSVFormat' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_HappyPath_CSVFormat | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:118: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:118 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_CSVFormat | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --format | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:122: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:122 | ||
| Error: "1" is not greater than or equal to "2" | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_CSVFormat | ||
| Messages: CSV should have headers and at least one data row, got: | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_CSVFormat (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_NDJSONFormat | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_HappyPath_NDJSONFormat' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_HappyPath_NDJSONFormat | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:146: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:146 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_NDJSONFormat | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --format | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:153: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:153 | ||
| Error: Should be true | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_NDJSONFormat | ||
| Messages: NDJSON line should be valid JSON: | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_NDJSONFormat (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_DryRun | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_HappyPath_DryRun' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_HappyPath_DryRun | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:172: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:172 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 0 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_DryRun | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --dry-run | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:175: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:175 | ||
| Error: Should be true | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_HappyPath_DryRun | ||
| Messages: dry-run output should contain API endpoint reference, got: | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_HappyPath_DryRun (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_BotIdentityRejected | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_ErrorCase_BotIdentityRejected' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_ErrorCase_BotIdentityRejected | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:193: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:193 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 2 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_BotIdentityRejected | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --as | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:197: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:197 | ||
| Error: Should be true | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_BotIdentityRejected | ||
| Messages: stderr should be valid JSON: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --as | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_BotIdentityRejected (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidFormatValue | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidFormatValue' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidFormatValue | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:243: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:243 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 2 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidFormatValue | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --format | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:247: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:247 | ||
| Error: Should be true | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidFormatValue | ||
| Messages: stderr should be valid JSON: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --format | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_InvalidFormatValue (0.01s) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### FAIL: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_UnknownFlag | ||
|
|
||
| **复现命令：** | ||
| ```bash | ||
| LARK_CLI_BIN=/workspace/lark-cli/bin/lark-cli \ | ||
| go test /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/... -run 'TestContactMe_ErrorCase_UnknownFlag' -v | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **输出：** | ||
| ``` | ||
| === RUN TestContactMe_ErrorCase_UnknownFlag | ||
| 2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:269: | ||
| Error Trace: /workspace/lark-cli/tests/cli_e2e/core.go:310 | ||
| /workspace/lark-cli/tests_e2e/contact/2026_04_16_contact_me_test.go:269 | ||
| Error: Not equal: | ||
| expected: 2 | ||
| actual : 1 | ||
| Test: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_UnknownFlag | ||
| Messages: stdout: | ||
|
|
||
| stderr: | ||
| Usage: | ||
| lark-cli contact [command] | ||
|
|
||
| Available Commands: | ||
| +get-user Get user info (omit user_id for self; provide user_id for specific user) | ||
| +search-user Search users (results sorted by relevance) | ||
|
|
||
| Flags: | ||
| -h, --help help for contact | ||
|
|
||
| Global Flags: | ||
| --profile string use a specific profile | ||
|
|
||
| Use "lark-cli contact [command] --help" for more information about a command. | ||
|
|
||
| Error: unknown flag: --unknown-flag | ||
| --- FAIL: TestContactMe_ErrorCase_UnknownFlag (0.01s) | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Question: Why are test failure reports for non-existent features being committed?
This file documents 10 contact command test failures, but:
-
Tests expect unimplemented features: All failures show "unknown flag" errors for
--format,--jq,--dry-run, and--as. The command help output (shown repeatedly in the errors) confirms these flags don't exist on thelark contactcommand. -
Unrelated to PR scope: This PR adds a
--debugflag to thelark apicommand, not thelark contactcommand. These test failures have no connection to the PR changes. -
Test validity concern: These tests appear to have been written for features that don't exist. Either:
- The tests are incorrect and should be removed/fixed
- The features are planned but not yet implemented
- The tests are for a different command
-
Repository hygiene: Similar to the other result file, committing test failure reports raises questions about repository maintenance practices.
Fix markdown formatting.
Ten fenced code blocks are missing language specifiers (lines 24, 59, 104, 149, 194, 239, 284, 329, 390, 451).
📝 Proposed fix
-**输出：**
-```
+**输出：**
+```textApply this pattern to all ten output blocks.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.0)
[warning] 24-24: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 59-59: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 104-104: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 149-149: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 194-194: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 239-239: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 284-284: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 329-329: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 390-390: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 451-451: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/superpowers/verify_results/e2e_result.md` around lines 1 - 480, Summary:
The committed E2E failure report documents tests for unimplemented contact flags
(--format, --jq, --dry-run, --as) that are unrelated to this PR and also
contains fenced code blocks missing language specifiers. Fix: remove or revert
this results file commit (docs/superpowers/verify_results/e2e_result.md) from
the PR or update it to not claim failures for TestContactMe_* tests that expect
non-existent flags (--format, --jq, --dry-run, --as); if keeping the file,
clearly mark these as outdated/irrelevant or move to a local/CI-only artifact
instead of committing; and correct markdown by adding the language specifier
"text" to all ten failing output code fences (the fenced blocks showing "输出："
for each TestContactMe_* section) so each ``` becomes ```text.
e6d5cba to
6984dc9
Compare
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar.event:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar.event%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit 6984dc9.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo 6984dc962c3cda9b0c6c08cfaeb1815b52a16516:docs/superpowers/result.md:lark-bot-app-id:44 >> .gitleaksignore
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit 6984dc9.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo 6984dc962c3cda9b0c6c08cfaeb1815b52a16516:docs/superpowers/result.md:lark-bot-app-id:97 >> .gitleaksignore
| --- PASS: TestIM_ChatsGetWorkflow/get_chat_info (0.43s) | ||
| === RUN TestIM_ChatsLinkWorkflow | ||
| === RUN TestIM_ChatsLinkWorkflow/get_chat_share_link | ||
| chat_workflow_test.go:122: Generated share link: https://applink.feishu.cn/client/chat/chatter/add_by_link?link_token=f5ar8bb8-58b6-4d36-9de1-744b79f61bd8 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id generic-api-key in commit 6984dc9.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo 6984dc962c3cda9b0c6c08cfaeb1815b52a16516:docs/superpowers/detail_info/e2e.log:generic-api-key:322 >> .gitleaksignore
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar.event:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar.event%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit 6984dc9.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo 6984dc962c3cda9b0c6c08cfaeb1815b52a16516:docs/superpowers/detail_info/e2e.log:lark-bot-app-id:127 >> .gitleaksignore
| "code": 99991672, | ||
| "message": "App scope not enabled: required scope calendar:calendar:create [99991672]", | ||
| "hint": "enable the scope in developer console (see console_url)", | ||
| "console_url": "https://open.feishu.cn/page/scope-apply?clientID=cli_a9574689a27a5cbb&scopes=calendar%3Acalendar%3Acreate" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Gitleaks has detected a secret with rule-id lark-bot-app-id in commit 6984dc9.
If this secret is a true positive, please rotate the secret ASAP.
If this secret is a false positive, you can add the fingerprint below to your .gitleaksignore file and commit the change to this branch.
echo 6984dc962c3cda9b0c6c08cfaeb1815b52a16516:docs/superpowers/detail_info/e2e.log:lark-bot-app-id:176 >> .gitleaksignore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
cmd/api/api.go (1)
280-319:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorEmit debug records from inside pagination, not after aggregation.
StreamPagesonly returns the last parsed result,PaginateAllreturns a synthetic merged result, and thejqExprbranch returns before any debug logging. As a result,--page-all --debugloses per-pagex-request-idvalues, and--page-all --jq --debugemits no debug record at all.Fix this by surfacing each raw
ApiRespfrom the pagination loop—e.g., via a debug callback/hook in pagination options—and calldebugLogResponsebefore each page is merged, streamed, or jq-filtered.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@cmd/api/api.go` around lines 280 - 319, The pagination debug is emitted only after aggregation; modify apiPaginate and the pagination flow to log each raw ApiResp as pages are received: add a per-page debug callback (e.g., OnPage or DebugHook) to client.PaginationOptions and populate it in apiPaginate so that StreamPages, PaginateAll, and PaginateWithJq invoke debugLogResponse(errOut, "", resp) for each ApiResp before merging/formatting/streaming; update calls to client.StreamPages, client.PaginateAll, and client.PaginateWithJq to pass the enhanced pagOpts (or wire the hook into the library functions) so --debug emits x-request-id for every page including jq and page-all paths.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-design.md`:
- Around line 86-103: The documented helper signature and pseudocode must be
aligned: change debugLogResponse to not return an error (signature: func
debugLogResponse(w io.Writer, logID string, response interface{})) and update
the implementation to intentionally ignore marshal/write failures (do not
propagate errors); perform json.Marshal and fmt.Fprintf but discard their errors
(e.g., assign to blank identifier or otherwise suppress) so callers are not
forced to handle errors and the main API flow remains unchanged.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@cmd/api/api.go`:
- Around line 280-319: The pagination debug is emitted only after aggregation;
modify apiPaginate and the pagination flow to log each raw ApiResp as pages are
received: add a per-page debug callback (e.g., OnPage or DebugHook) to
client.PaginationOptions and populate it in apiPaginate so that StreamPages,
PaginateAll, and PaginateWithJq invoke debugLogResponse(errOut, "", resp) for
each ApiResp before merging/formatting/streaming; update calls to
client.StreamPages, client.PaginateAll, and client.PaginateWithJq to pass the
enhanced pagOpts (or wire the hook into the library functions) so --debug emits
x-request-id for every page including jq and page-all paths.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f10b3f7e-2205-4731-b316-d5fbb022e140
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.gitignorecmd/api/api.gocmd/api/api_test.godocs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-plan.mddocs/superpowers/retros/meta-api-debug-retro.mddocs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-design.mdtests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.gotests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- docs/superpowers/retros/meta-api-debug-retro.md
- tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .gitignore
- cmd/api/api_test.go
- tests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml
| **Architecture:** Modify cmd/api/api.go to capture *larkcore.ApiResp before routing through HandleResponse, extract logID from header, and write debug JSON records to stderr. For pagination, output one debug record per page. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Make the pagination plan internally consistent.
The architecture states “one debug record per page,” but the known limitation says the current implementation emits only an aggregated result without per-page responses. Pick the intended contract here; otherwise agentic workers may implement or test the wrong behavior.
Also applies to: 724-726
| 5. 新增 `debugLogResponse(w io.Writer, logID string, response interface{}) error` 函数 | ||
|
|
||
| #### 调试输出函数实现伪代码 | ||
|
|
||
| ```go | ||
| func debugLogResponse(w io.Writer, logID string, response interface{}) error { | ||
| record := map[string]interface{}{ | ||
| "log_id": logID, | ||
| "response": response, | ||
| "timestamp": time.Now().UTC().Format(time.RFC3339), | ||
| } | ||
| data, err := json.Marshal(record) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| fmt.Fprintf(w, "%s\n", string(data)) | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Align the documented helper signature with the implementation.
The spec says debugLogResponse returns error, but the implementation intentionally returns nothing and silently skips marshal/write failures. Update the pseudocode so future agents do not reintroduce error propagation into the main API flow.
Proposed doc update
-5. 新增 `debugLogResponse(w io.Writer, logID string, response interface{}) error` 函数
+5. 新增 `debugLogResponse(w io.Writer, logID string, response interface{})` 函数
...
-func debugLogResponse(w io.Writer, logID string, response interface{}) error {
+func debugLogResponse(w io.Writer, logID string, response interface{}) {
...
- return err
+ return
...
- return nil
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-18-meta-api-debug-design.md` around lines 86 -
103, The documented helper signature and pseudocode must be aligned: change
debugLogResponse to not return an error (signature: func debugLogResponse(w
io.Writer, logID string, response interface{})) and update the implementation to
intentionally ignore marshal/write failures (do not propagate errors); perform
json.Marshal and fmt.Fprintf but discard their errors (e.g., assign to blank
identifier or otherwise suppress) so callers are not forced to handle errors and
the main API flow remains unchanged.
427f34e to
d74a05b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
cmd/api/api.go (1)
280-327:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorPagination debug drops
log_idand emits only the aggregated result.Both
apiPaginatebranches calldebugLogResponse(errOut, "", result)— passing an emptylogIDand the post-aggregationresult, not each page's raw response. This breaks the primary value proposition of--debug(capturing the per-responsex-request-idfor server-side troubleshooting):
- The PR description and AI summary state that paginated requests are supported, but operators get a single record with
"log_id": ""regardless of how many pages were fetched.- The skill-eval spec (
tests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml, per AI summary) explicitly calls out "page-specificx-request-idcoverage," which the current code cannot satisfy.StreamPages/PaginateAllcallbacks don't expose per-page headers, so adding real per-page debug likely requires plumbing a hook (e.g., anOnPageResponse func(*http.Response)option) through the client.At minimum, document the current limitation in the flag help text; ideally, emit one JSON record per page with its own
x-request-idto match single-page semantics.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@cmd/api/api.go` around lines 280 - 327, apiPaginate currently calls debugLogResponse(errOut, "", result) after aggregation, which drops per-page x-request-id and yields empty "log_id"; to fix, add a per-page response hook to the pagination flow and use it for debug output: add an OnPageResponse func(*http.Response) to the pagination options or API client (reference client.PaginationOptions, ac.StreamPages, ac.PaginateAll), propagate that hook into the client pagination implementation so StreamPages/PaginateAll invoke it for each page, and in apiPaginate use that hook to call debugLogResponse(errOut, logID, rawPageResult) for each page (fall back to current aggregated debug behavior if the hook is nil); if you cannot plumb the hook now, update the --debug flag help text to document that per-page x-request-id is not available for paginated requests.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cmd/api/api.go (1)
331-346: Consider writing debug output atomically.
fmt.Fprintf(w, "%s\n", string(data))issues two writes (format produces one buffer, but under interleaved writers to the same fd from other goroutines the newline termination isn't the issue —json.Marshalalready produces a single line, so a singlew.Write(append(data, '\n'))makes the intent explicit and avoids the redundant%sformatting of an already-string payload). Minor polish.♻️ Proposed tweak
- _, _ = fmt.Fprintf(w, "%s\n", string(data)) + _, _ = w.Write(append(data, '\n'))🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@cmd/api/api.go` around lines 331 - 346, The debugLogResponse function should perform a single atomic write instead of using fmt.Fprintf; replace the fmt.Fprintf call in debugLogResponse with a single w.Write call that writes the marshaled JSON bytes plus a newline in one write (handle or ignore the returned n, err as before) to avoid formatting overhead and potential interleaving from multiple writers.tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go (1)
33-38: Whole-stderrjson.Unmarshalis fragile.Directly parsing
result.Stderras JSON (here and at lines 165, 260) assumes nothing else is ever written to stderr for a successfulapi get. Any future warning (format fallback, identity hint, deprecation notice, etc.) will break these tests even though the--debugbehavior is intact. Prefer the first-line extraction pattern already used byTestDebugFlag_PostRequest/TestDebugFlag_ErrorResponsefor consistency and robustness.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go` around lines 33 - 38, The test currently unmarshals the entire result.Stderr which is fragile; change the code in this test and the other two locations (around lines 165 and 260) to extract the first non-empty line from result.Stderr and unmarshal only that line into debugRecord. Concretely, replace direct json.Unmarshal([]byte(result.Stderr), &debugRecord) with logic that trims stderr, splits on newline (or uses a scanner) to pick the first non-empty line, then json.Unmarshal that firstLine into debugRecord; apply the same pattern used by TestDebugFlag_PostRequest and TestDebugFlag_ErrorResponse so result.Stderr can contain other incidental warnings without breaking the JSON parse.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go`:
- Around line 276-312: The test debug_with_page_all_multiple_records is too
permissive; change the final assertion to require at least 2 JSON debug records
(e.g., require.GreaterOrEqual(t, validRecords, 2) or compare to expected pages
when using "--page-limit 2") and tighten per-record checks by asserting each
debugRecord["log_id"] is a non-empty string (use assert.NotEmpty(t,
debugRecord["log_id"]) or assert.IsType/len checks) in addition to the existing
response/timestamp assertions; update the assertions in this test and ensure the
checks run for every parsed JSON record so apiPaginate must emit one debug
record per page.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@cmd/api/api.go`:
- Around line 280-327: apiPaginate currently calls debugLogResponse(errOut, "",
result) after aggregation, which drops per-page x-request-id and yields empty
"log_id"; to fix, add a per-page response hook to the pagination flow and use it
for debug output: add an OnPageResponse func(*http.Response) to the pagination
options or API client (reference client.PaginationOptions, ac.StreamPages,
ac.PaginateAll), propagate that hook into the client pagination implementation
so StreamPages/PaginateAll invoke it for each page, and in apiPaginate use that
hook to call debugLogResponse(errOut, logID, rawPageResult) for each page (fall
back to current aggregated debug behavior if the hook is nil); if you cannot
plumb the hook now, update the --debug flag help text to document that per-page
x-request-id is not available for paginated requests.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@cmd/api/api.go`:
- Around line 331-346: The debugLogResponse function should perform a single
atomic write instead of using fmt.Fprintf; replace the fmt.Fprintf call in
debugLogResponse with a single w.Write call that writes the marshaled JSON bytes
plus a newline in one write (handle or ignore the returned n, err as before) to
avoid formatting overhead and potential interleaving from multiple writers.
In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go`:
- Around line 33-38: The test currently unmarshals the entire result.Stderr
which is fragile; change the code in this test and the other two locations
(around lines 165 and 260) to extract the first non-empty line from
result.Stderr and unmarshal only that line into debugRecord. Concretely, replace
direct json.Unmarshal([]byte(result.Stderr), &debugRecord) with logic that trims
stderr, splits on newline (or uses a scanner) to pick the first non-empty line,
then json.Unmarshal that firstLine into debugRecord; apply the same pattern used
by TestDebugFlag_PostRequest and TestDebugFlag_ErrorResponse so result.Stderr
can contain other incidental warnings without breaking the JSON parse.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 353d40f0-2805-4789-a8e1-03d5dc8c773e
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.gitignorecmd/api/api.gocmd/api/api_test.gotests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.gotests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- tests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml
- cmd/api/api_test.go
| t.Run("debug_with_page_all_multiple_records", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| // Using --page-all with --page-limit to control number of pages | ||
| result, err := clie2e.RunCmd(ctx, clie2e.Request{ | ||
| Args: []string{"api", "get", "/open-apis/contact/v3/users", "--page-all", "--page-limit", "2", "--debug"}, | ||
| }) | ||
| require.NoError(t, err) | ||
| result.AssertExitCode(t, 0) | ||
|
|
||
| require.NotEmpty(t, result.Stderr, "stderr should contain debug output for paginated request") | ||
|
|
||
| // Split stderr into lines and find valid debug JSON records (may have progress messages) | ||
| trimmedStderr := strings.TrimSpace(result.Stderr) | ||
| lines := strings.Split(trimmedStderr, "\n") | ||
|
|
||
| var validRecords int | ||
| for _, line := range lines { | ||
| if strings.TrimSpace(line) == "" { | ||
| continue | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var debugRecord map[string]interface{} | ||
| err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(line), &debugRecord) | ||
| // Skip non-JSON lines (progress messages, warnings, etc.) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| continue | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| validRecords++ | ||
| // Verify each debug record has required fields | ||
| assert.NotNil(t, debugRecord["log_id"], "each debug record should have log_id") | ||
| assert.NotNil(t, debugRecord["response"], "each debug record should have response") | ||
| assert.NotNil(t, debugRecord["timestamp"], "each debug record should have timestamp") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // For a paginated request, we should have at least 1 debug record | ||
| require.Greater(t, validRecords, 0, "should have at least 1 debug JSON record from pagination") | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Paged-request test is too permissive to catch the pagination debug gap.
require.Greater(t, validRecords, 0) passes as long as any JSON line appears, so the current implementation emitting exactly one aggregated record with empty log_id satisfies this assertion. To actually validate the intended --debug contract for pagination, this test should:
- Assert
len(validRecords) >= 2(or match the number of pages fetched) when--page-limit 2with available data, and - Assert each record's
log_idis a non-empty string (as the single-page test does at line 267).
Without these, the test can't distinguish correct per-page debug output from the aggregate-only behavior currently in apiPaginate (see separate comment on cmd/api/api.go).
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go` around lines 276 - 312, The
test debug_with_page_all_multiple_records is too permissive; change the final
assertion to require at least 2 JSON debug records (e.g.,
require.GreaterOrEqual(t, validRecords, 2) or compare to expected pages when
using "--page-limit 2") and tighten per-record checks by asserting each
debugRecord["log_id"] is a non-empty string (use assert.NotEmpty(t,
debugRecord["log_id"]) or assert.IsType/len checks) in addition to the existing
response/timestamp assertions; update the assertions in this test and ensure the
checks run for every parsed JSON record so apiPaginate must emit one debug
record per page.
d74a05b to
1e2f165
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@tests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.go`:
- Around line 110-118: The stderr check is too loose—scan stderr line-by-line
and detect actual debug JSON records (objects containing
"log_id","response","timestamp") instead of a global JSON/unstructured substring
match; add a helper function hasDebugRecord(stderr string) bool that splits
strings.TrimSpace(stderr) by "\n", trims each line, attempts json.Unmarshal into
a map[string]interface{}, and returns true only when a line contains all three
keys; then replace the current negative-control assertions in tests that inspect
result.Stderr/trimmedStderr (the block around trimmedStderr and the similar
block at lines 138-144) to assert that hasDebugRecord(result.Stderr) is false,
and use the same helper for positive controls to assert true when appropriate.
- Line 20: The tests leak developer/CI CLI config because RunCmd calls inherit
the real config dir; before any RunCmd invocation in
TestDebugFlag_SinglePageRequest (and the other listed tests), create an isolated
temp config dir and set the LARKSUITE_CLI_CONFIG_DIR env var to it (e.g. use
t.TempDir() and t.Setenv("LARKSUITE_CLI_CONFIG_DIR", tmp) or os.MkdirTemp +
os.Setenv) so each test runs with an empty config; update the setup at the top
of TestDebugFlag_SinglePageRequest and similarly in the other test functions so
RunCmd sees the temporary config directory.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: a6b7dd52-0f50-4778-aadd-3a2e7d428a06
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.gitignorecmd/api/api.gocmd/api/api_test.gotests_e2e/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_test.gotests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .gitignore
- tests_skill_eval/api/2026_04_18_meta_api_debug_evals.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- cmd/api/api_test.go
- cmd/api/api.go
MaxHuang22
force-pushed
the
feat/meta-api-debug
branch
from
1e2f165 to
5e38d7d
Compare
MaxHuang22
force-pushed
the
feat/meta-api-debug
branch
from
5e38d7d to
fe41234
Compare
1 participant
Summary
Add
--debugflag tolark apicommand to capture and output raw HTTP response and request ID to stderr in JSON format. This aids in debugging API interactions and troubleshooting integration issues.Changes
cmd/api/api.go: Add Debug field to APIOptions, register --debug flag, capture responsescmd/api/api_test.go: Unit tests for debugLogResponse() and --debug flag integrationTest Plan
make unit-testpassedmake validatepassedlark api GET /open-apis/contact/v3/users --debugoutputs JSON to stderr with log_id, response, and timestamp fieldsRelated Issues
N/A
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests
Chores