Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis change updates Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Router as Pre-exec Router
participant CLI as lark-cli
participant DocsSearch as lark-docs(+search)
participant BaseModule as Base Module
User->>Router: Provide Base identifier (name/keywords)
Router->>CLI: Invoke `docs +search` (filter=BITABLE)
CLI->>DocsSearch: Run search query
DocsSearch-->>CLI: Return matched resources
CLI-->>Router: Deliver discovered resources
Router->>BaseModule: Route with selected Base URL
BaseModule-->>User: Continue Base commands
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 7/8 reviews remaining, refill in 7 minutes and 30 seconds.Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #708 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 63.80% 64.06% +0.26%
==========================================
Files 500 503 +3
Lines 43531 44091 +560
==========================================
+ Hits 27773 28249 +476
- Misses 13317 13382 +65
- Partials 2441 2460 +19 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
skills/lark-base/SKILL.md (1)
17-17: Optional: Consider minor phrasing adjustment for clarity.The static analysis tool flagged potential ambiguity in the phrase "按名称/关键词查找 Base、多维表格、bitable 或报表". While the meaning is clear in context, you could optionally rephrase for maximum clarity, such as:
- "如果用户要按名称或关键词查找 Base(多维表格/bitable)或报表"
- "如果用户要通过名称/关键词定位 Base、多维表格、bitable 或报表资源"
However, given that the PR objectives mention successful practical verification where agents followed the guidance correctly, the current phrasing appears adequate.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@skills/lark-base/SKILL.md` at line 17, The phrase "按名称/关键词查找 Base、多维表格、bitable 或报表" in SKILL.md may be slightly ambiguous; please optionally rephrase that sentence to improve clarity by replacing that fragment with one of the suggested alternatives (e.g., "按名称或关键词查找 Base(多维表格/bitable)或报表" or "通过名称/关键词定位 Base、多维表格、bitable 或报表资源") while keeping the rest of the guidance and the referenced lark-cli commands intact.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@skills/lark-base/SKILL.md`:
- Line 17: The phrase "按名称/关键词查找 Base、多维表格、bitable 或报表" in SKILL.md may be
slightly ambiguous; please optionally rephrase that sentence to improve clarity
by replacing that fragment with one of the suggested alternatives (e.g.,
"按名称或关键词查找 Base(多维表格/bitable)或报表" or "通过名称/关键词定位 Base、多维表格、bitable 或报表资源") while
keeping the rest of the guidance and the referenced lark-cli commands intact.
🚀 PR Preview Install Guide🧰 CLI updatenpm i -g https://pkg.pr.new/larksuite/cli/@larksuite/cli@7602ac0b382ebd9d942f8221fcee455490a3effe🧩 Skill updatenpx skills add larksuite/cli#codex/lark-base-search-guidance -y -g |
d796da7 to
47d6500
Compare
47d6500 to
e53d73f
Compare
Summary
Clarify the
lark-baseskill route for finding Base/bitable resources by name or keyword before doing table-level operations. This helps agents avoid inventing nonexistent Base search commands and instead use the existing cloud-space search shortcut.Changes
lark-baseskill description.lark-doc/references/lark-doc-search.md, runlark-cli docs +search --query ... --filter '{"doc_types":["BITABLE"]}', then return tolark-cli base +....base +search,lark-doc +search, anddrive +search.Test Plan
make unit-testlark xxxcommand works as expectedgit diff --check -- skills/lark-base/SKILL.mdRelated Issues
Summary by CodeRabbit