Skip to content

Conversation

@Daviey
Copy link
Contributor

@Daviey Daviey commented Sep 26, 2016

Previously only To was supported on rfc822 importing and
Cc/Bcc was silently dropped.

This change adds support (and related test) for these two
fields.

Signed-off-by: Dave Walker (Daviey) email@daviey.com

Previously only To was supported on rfc822 importing and
Cc/Bcc was silently dropped.

This change adds support (and related test) for these two
fields.

Signed-off-by: Dave Walker (Daviey) <email@daviey.com>
@Daviey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Daviey commented Sep 26, 2016

Oh Dang, i see you literally just cut 0.5.10.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 26, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 92.25% when pulling 8a1730d on Daviey:master into 9a7d35a on lavr:master.

if self.cc:
self.set_header(msg, 'Cc', ", ".join([self.encode_address_header(addr) for addr in self.cc]), encode=False)

if self.bcc:
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought Bcc should be used in SMTP MAIL TO command only.
Is there any reason to include it in message headers?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants