Skip to content

Add support for subfield t,g,k (245 field) #236

@kirkhess

Description

@kirkhess

If subfield $t and subfield $g are included in the title (which is unlikely but possible), the subfields will no longer be in the order they originally were and $g and $t will not be assigned to their associated strings. However, the same is true for $k which is used much more often.

Example:
730 02 $a High on the hill $t Why is there a $t? $n Part 2 $p The good part $d 1956 $f 1955 $g misc info $k Papers $l English $m Piano $o arranged $r C major $s Version B $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2010189088 $1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGmgQGB866cRJQCtrRqvpP $1 https://id.loc.gov/resources/works/5711546

Convert with marc2bibframe2, back to MARC w/ bibframe2marc (roundtrip):
image

Post-processing fix:
image

Field ends up with the t, g, k appended to subfield a
image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions