Raise min LLVM version to 3.9#2872
Conversation
3cbde39 to
5277ce2
Compare
|
Certainly in favor of this. To prevent complaints later: https://forum.dlang.org/post/bmsdqayozfuxvbuwklbu@forum.dlang.org |
|
+1, unless the forum thread brings up anything. |
|
[I forgot to remove the FileCheck and llvm-profdata .cpp files, amended now.] |
joakim-noah
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Heh, I didn't know how much work had gone into supporting these old LLVM versions.
|
Yep, the diff is nice – it's mostly leaving old code behind for a while though after tracking API changes, so not that bad. |
|
(Oh yes, that's definitely a good idea. I was responding only to Joakim's comment about the amount of effort to support old versions, where in actuality, the effort is mostly spent on new versions.) |
|
DMD's BuildKite is broken and the logs seem to point to this PR. Logs: Looks like we're trying to use 3.8. See this issue to continue the discussion. |
|
Looks like the CMake config still allows 3.7/8, needs to be updated. |
|
Yeah, I grepped for Edit: Ah, already fixed (the DMD problem), thx Joakim. |
Yeah, but you can use: User: dummy@dlang.io until they finally fix that. |
No description provided.