Skip to content

Conversation

@chenson2018
Copy link
Collaborator

See this Zulip discussion. Instead of accumulating changes required for Mathlib compatibility in nightly-testing, we will more frequently run lake update and PR to the main branch. I plan for there to be a workflow to semi-automate these PRs. In the meantime nightly-testing will still report any issues and prompt me to make a PR manually.

@chenson2018 chenson2018 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 27, 2026
Merged via the queue into leanprover:main with commit 678c42e Jan 27, 2026
2 checks passed
arademaker pushed a commit to arademaker/cslib that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2026
See [this Zulip
discussion](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/513188-CSLib/topic/.60lake.20update.60.20in.20CsLib/with/569849603).
Instead of accumulating changes required for Mathlib compatibility in
`nightly-testing`, we will more frequently run `lake update` and PR to
the `main` branch. I plan for there to be a workflow to semi-automate
these PRs. In the meantime `nightly-testing` will still report any
issues and prompt me to make a PR manually.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants