Skip to content

Add wait_for_file util for tests#17

Merged
leynos merged 3 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-wait_for_file-helper-function
Jul 31, 2025
Merged

Add wait_for_file util for tests#17
leynos merged 3 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-wait_for_file-helper-function

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Jul 29, 2025

Summary

  • add wait_for_file async helper
  • use wait_for_file in listener steps and daemon tests
  • expose support module to cucumber tests

Testing

  • make lint
  • make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6888f7f383e08322ad8cf2ffd76d7a4a

Summary by Sourcery

Add a reusable wait_for_file utility for asynchronous tests and refactor existing daemon and listener tests to use it, exposing the support module to cucumber tests

New Features:

  • Add async helper wait_for_file to synchronize test file and socket creation

Enhancements:

  • Refactor daemon and listener tests to use wait_for_file instead of manual polling loops
  • Expose test support module to cucumber tests

Tests:

  • Introduce tests/support/util.rs with wait_for_file and update test code to leverage it

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Introduce an async wait_for_file helper in a new test support module to replace ad-hoc polling loops, refactor daemon and cucumber listener tests to use this helper, and expose the support module for reuse in Cucumber tests.

Class diagram for new test support utilities

classDiagram
    class util {
        +async fn wait_for_file(path: &Path, retries: u32, delay: Duration) -> ()
    }
    class mod {
        <<module>>
    }
    mod <|-- util: contains
Loading

Class diagram for refactored daemon test module usage

classDiagram
    class DaemonTests {
        +async fn setup_run_worker(status: u16)
        +async fn test_queue_directory_creation()
        +async fn test_listener_socket_creation()
    }
    class util {
        +async fn wait_for_file(path: &Path, retries: u32, delay: Duration) -> ()
    }
    DaemonTests ..> util: uses
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Add wait_for_file async helper and expose it in tests
  • Implemented wait_for_file with configurable tries and delay
  • Created tests/support/util.rs with the helper
  • Added tests/support/mod.rs to re-export util module
tests/support/util.rs
tests/support/mod.rs
Refactor daemon tests to use wait_for_file
  • Imported util::wait_for_file via path attribute
  • Replaced manual loops for queue directory readiness
  • Replaced manual loops for socket file readiness
crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs
Refactor Cucumber listener steps to use wait_for_file
  • Removed manual polling loop for socket readiness
  • Added wait_for_file assertion for socket file creation
tests/steps/listener_steps.rs

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@leynos has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17eda17 and c786d98.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs (3 hunks)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified test logic by replacing manual polling loops with a reusable asynchronous helper for waiting on file existence.
  • Chores
    • Introduced a new test support utility package to centralise and share common test helpers across the workspace.
    • Updated project configuration to include the new test support package as a development dependency.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/add-wait_for_file-helper-function

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

leynos commented Jul 30, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 30, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5553911 and 1ea478c.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs (3 hunks)
  • tests/cucumber.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/steps/listener_steps.rs (2 hunks)
  • tests/support/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/support/util.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/support/mod.rs
  • tests/cucumber.rs
  • tests/support/util.rs
  • tests/steps/listener_steps.rs
  • crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
tests/steps/listener_steps.rs (1)
tests/support/util.rs (1)
  • wait_for_file (22-30)
crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs (1)
tests/support/util.rs (1)
  • wait_for_file (22-30)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
tests/support/util.rs (3)

1-4: LGTM! Excellent module documentation.

The module doc comment properly explains the purpose and utility, following the required //! format and en-GB spelling conventions.


9-21: LGTM! Comprehensive function documentation.

The doc comment includes a clear description and practical example demonstrating proper usage.


22-30: Remove explicit return statement on line 25.

Line 25 violates the coding guideline that prohibits return in single-line functions.

-            return true;
+            true

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

tests/support/mod.rs (1)

1-3: LGTM! Clean module organisation.

The module properly declares the util submodule and includes the required module doc comment.

tests/cucumber.rs (1)

2-2: LGTM! Proper module integration.

The support module import correctly makes the test utilities available to the cucumber test framework.

tests/steps/listener_steps.rs (2)

8-8: LGTM! Proper utility import.

The import correctly references the new wait_for_file utility from the support module.


69-73: LGTM! Excellent refactoring to use shared utility.

The manual polling loop has been properly replaced with the reusable wait_for_file utility. The timeout parameters (10 tries × 10ms) are appropriate for test scenarios, and the assertion message is descriptive.

crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs (2)

241-241: LGTM! Appropriate timeout for queue directory creation.

The 200 tries × 10ms delay (2 second timeout) is reasonable for waiting for queue directory creation, and properly replaces the manual polling logic.


305-305: LGTM! Appropriate timeout for socket creation.

The 10 tries × 10ms delay (100ms timeout) is reasonable for waiting for socket creation, and properly replaces the manual polling logic.

Comment thread crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
tests/steps/listener_steps.rs (1)

78-90: Swap unwrap() for expect() to comply with project lint policy.

The file opts into unwrap_used, but the coding guidelines mandate expect() for clearer failure output. Replace bare unwrap() calls throughout this test.

-    let data = serde_json::to_vec(&req).unwrap();
+    let data = serde_json::to_vec(&req).expect("serialise request");
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ea478c and 17eda17.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • crates/comenqd/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs (3 hunks)
  • test-support/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • test-support/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
  • test-support/src/util.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/steps/listener_steps.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Write unit and behavioural tests for new functionality. Run both before and after making any change.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Use concat!() to combine long string literals rather than escaping newlines with a backslash.
Prefer semantic error enums. Derive std::error::Error (via the thiserror crate) for any condition the caller might inspect, retry, or map to an HTTP status.
Use an opaque error only at the app boundary. Use eyre::Report for human-readable logs; these should not be exposed in public APIs.
Never export the opaque type from a library. Convert to domain enums at API boundaries, and to eyre only in the main main() entrypoint or top-level async task.

Files:

  • tests/steps/listener_steps.rs
  • test-support/src/lib.rs
  • crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs
  • test-support/src/util.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/steps/listener_steps.rs
  • test-support/src/lib.rs
  • crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs
  • test-support/src/util.rs
Cargo.toml

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

Cargo.toml: Use explicit version ranges in Cargo.toml and keep dependencies up-to-date.
Mandate caret requirements for all dependencies: All crate versions specified in Cargo.toml must use SemVer-compatible caret requirements (e.g., some-crate = "1.2.3").
Prohibit unstable version specifiers: The use of wildcard (*) or open-ended inequality (>=) version requirements is strictly forbidden as they introduce unacceptable risk and unpredictability. Tilde requirements (~) should only be used where a dependency must be locked to patch-level updates for a specific, documented reason.

Files:

  • Cargo.toml
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
tests/steps/listener_steps.rs (1)
test-support/src/util.rs (1)
  • wait_for_file (22-30)
test-support/src/lib.rs (1)
test-support/src/util.rs (1)
  • wait_for_file (22-30)
crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs (1)
test-support/src/util.rs (1)
  • wait_for_file (22-30)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
test-support/Cargo.toml (2)

4-4: Pin the edition to a currently-stable release.

Edition 2024 targets the upcoming Rust edition and requires a nightly toolchain. Ensure the CI image supplies a compatible compiler, otherwise downgrade to 2021 to keep the crate buildable on stable.


6-7: LGTM – workspace dependency is correctly declared.
Using the workspace-scoped tokio avoids version skew across crates.

crates/comenqd/Cargo.toml (1)

26-26: LGTM – dev-dependency wired in cleanly.
The relative path resolves inside the workspace and keeps the production build free from test-only code.

Cargo.toml (2)

30-35: LGTM – workspace member list updated.
The new crate is properly added to the workspace, allowing cargo to build it by default.


24-25: Avoid redundant path specifications.

Because test-support is already a workspace member, listing it again under [dev-dependencies] is optional. Remove the stanza to rely on the implicit workspace resolution and trim duplication.

- test-support = { path = "test-support" }
+ # test-support is a workspace member; explicit dev-dep not required

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

crates/comenqd/src/daemon.rs (4)

168-168: LGTM! Proper module dependency resolves fragile path import.

The import of wait_for_file from test_support crate addresses the previous concern about brittle relative path imports and follows proper modularity principles.


172-172: LGTM! Import cleanup removes unused Instant.

Removing Instant from the tokio::time import is appropriate since the manual polling loops that used it have been replaced with the wait_for_file utility.


239-239: LGTM! Simplified test synchronisation improves maintainability.

The replacement of the manual polling loop with wait_for_file makes the test more readable and maintainable. The parameters (200 tries, 10ms delay) provide adequate waiting time for the queue directory creation.


303-303: LGTM! Consistent use of wait_for_file utility.

The refactoring correctly replaces manual polling with the shared utility. The parameters (10 tries, 10ms delay) are appropriate for socket creation timing.

test-support/src/util.rs (3)

1-4: LGTM! Proper module documentation follows guidelines.

The module-level documentation clearly explains the purpose and utility, adhering to the requirement that every module must begin with a //! doc comment.


9-21: LGTM! Comprehensive Rustdoc documentation with practical example.

The function documentation follows Rust conventions with a clear description and practical example. The ignore attribute in the example is appropriate since it contains async code that cannot be executed in doc tests without additional setup.


22-30: LGTM! Clean implementation with appropriate error handling.

The function implementation is correct and follows Rust best practices:

  • Uses immutable parameters
  • Avoids panicking by returning bool instead of Result
  • Performs a final existence check after the loop to handle edge cases
  • Simple, readable logic that matches the documented behaviour

The approach of checking existence one final time after the loop ensures correctness even if the file appears during the final sleep period.

Comment thread test-support/src/lib.rs
Comment thread tests/steps/listener_steps.rs
@leynos leynos merged commit ec8f010 into main Jul 31, 2025
1 check passed
@leynos leynos deleted the codex/add-wait_for_file-helper-function branch July 31, 2025 21:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant