Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis PR enriches the documentation for the Class diagram for Token and tokenize_markdown documentationclassDiagram
class Token {
<<enum>>
+Text(&'a str)
+Code(&'a str)
}
class tokenize_markdown {
+tokenize_markdown(input: &str) Vec<Token<'_>>
}
tokenize_markdown ..> Token : returns
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@leynos has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughRemove a blank line before a code block in the README and expand the documentation comment for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md(0 hunks)src/wrap.rs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- README.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs
Instructions used from:
Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine
- AGENTS.md
⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
src/wrap.rs
[error] 130-150: Rust doctest failure: function tokenize_markdown is private and cannot be accessed in the doctest at line 130. The function is declared as pub(crate) making it inaccessible outside the crate scope, causing compilation failure with error E0603.
leynos
deleted the
codex/add-documentation-for-tokenize_markdown-function
branch
1 participant
Summary
tokenize_markdownstate machineTesting
make lintmake testmake markdownlintmake nixiehttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_687d947517d08322ab855ece2e8eb987
Summary by Sourcery
Expand and improve the documentation of the Markdown tokenizer and fix a formatting error in the README.
Documentation:
tokenize_markdownexplaining its state machine and usage example