Skip to content

Add regression test for trailing period in list items#131

Merged
leynos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-test-for-bullet-point-line-wrapping
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add regression test for trailing period in list items#131
leynos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-test-for-bullet-point-line-wrapping

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Jul 29, 2025

Summary

  • prevent line wrapping from splitting trailing punctuation after code spans
  • cover the regression with a new test

Testing

  • make lint
  • make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68889fa6ea8c832282c274fcbddc08f0

Summary by Sourcery

Prevent line wrapping from splitting trailing punctuation after inline code spans and add a regression test for list items ending with a trailing period

Bug Fixes:

  • Avoid splitting trailing punctuation tokens from code spans when wrapping lines

Tests:

  • Add regression test and accompanying input/expected data for list items ending with a full stop after inline code

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Enhance the line-wrapping logic to preserve trailing punctuation after inline code spans and add a regression test with fixtures to cover list items ending in a period.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Preserve punctuation after code spans during wrapping
  • Inserted a conditional in wrap_preserving_code to detect single-character punctuation at the start of a new line when the previous line ends with a backtick
  • Append the punctuation to the previous line and skip normal wrapping for that token
src/wrap.rs
Add regression test for list items ending with a period after code
  • Created a new test function test_wrap_list_item_period_after_code in tests/wrap.rs
  • Added input and expected output fixture files for the regression scenario
tests/wrap.rs
tests/data/bullet_full_stop_input.txt
tests/data/bullet_full_stop_expected.txt

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes

  • Improved text wrapping to ensure punctuation marks (such as periods, question marks, exclamation marks, commas, colons, and semicolons) immediately follow inline code in lists, rather than being placed on a new line.

Tests

  • Added new regression tests to verify correct handling of punctuation after inline code in list items.

Walkthrough

Introduce a conditional in the wrap_preserving_code function to ensure that punctuation marks immediately follow inline code spans within wrapped text, rather than being separated onto new lines. Add multiple regression tests and supporting input/output files to verify this behaviour across various punctuation marks, particularly for list items ending with inline code and punctuation. Supplement test data files with best practice notes on using StateScoped components for automatic entity despawning tied to application states.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Wrapping Logic Update
src/wrap.rs
Add conditional logic in wrap_preserving_code to append certain punctuation directly after inline code spans.
Regression Tests
tests/wrap.rs
Add multiple tests verifying punctuation placement after inline code in list items for ., ?, !, ,, :, and ;.
Test Fixtures: Inputs
tests/data/bullet_full_stop_input.txt, ..._question_mark_input.txt, ..._exclamation_mark_input.txt, ..._comma_input.txt, ..._colon_input.txt, ..._semicolon_input.txt
Add input files illustrating list items with inline code followed by various punctuation marks.
Test Fixtures: Expected Outputs
tests/data/bullet_full_stop_expected.txt, ..._question_mark_expected.txt, ..._exclamation_mark_expected.txt, ..._comma_expected.txt, ..._colon_expected.txt, ..._semicolon_expected.txt
Add expected output files showing correct punctuation placement after inline code for the respective tests.
Documentation in Test Data
tests/data/bullet_*_input.txt, tests/data/bullet_*_expected.txt
Add best practice notes on using StateScoped components to manage entity lifecycles tied to application states, simplifying test cleanup.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Runner
    participant Wrap as wrap_preserving_code
    participant Files as Input/Expected Files

    Test->>Files: Read bullet_full_stop_input.txt
    Test->>Wrap: Call process_stream(input)
    Wrap->>Wrap: Iterate tokens
    alt Punctuation after inline code
        Wrap->>Wrap: Append punctuation to previous line
    else Normal token
        Wrap->>Wrap: Standard wrapping
    end
    Wrap-->>Test: Return wrapped output
    Test->>Files: Read bullet_full_stop_expected.txt
    Test->>Test: Assert output == expected
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Inline code with a dot or two,
Now sticks together, just like glue.
No lonely marks upon a line,
The wrapping’s neat, the tests align.
With every check, the code feels right—
Punctuation hugs code tight!
🎉

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/add-test-for-bullet-point-line-wrapping

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `tests/wrap.rs:483` </location>
<code_context>
+/// The period following the inline code span should remain on the same line
+/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
+#[test]
+fn test_wrap_list_item_period_after_code() {
+    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_full_stop_input.txt");
+    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_full_stop_expected.txt");
+    let output = process_stream(&input);
+    assert_eq!(output, expected);
+}
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
Consider adding additional edge cases for other punctuation marks after code spans.

Please add regression tests for other punctuation marks handled by the implementation, such as '?', '!', ',', ':', and ';', to ensure full coverage.

Suggested implementation:

```rust
#[test]
fn test_wrap_list_item_period_after_code() {
    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_full_stop_input.txt");
    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_full_stop_expected.txt");
    let output = process_stream(&input);
    assert_eq!(output, expected);
}

/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a question mark.
///
/// The question mark following the inline code span should remain on the same line
/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
#[test]
fn test_wrap_list_item_question_mark_after_code() {
    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_question_mark_input.txt");
    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_question_mark_expected.txt");
    let output = process_stream(&input);
    assert_eq!(output, expected);
}

/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with an exclamation mark.
///
/// The exclamation mark following the inline code span should remain on the same line
/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
#[test]
fn test_wrap_list_item_exclamation_mark_after_code() {
    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt");
    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_exclamation_mark_expected.txt");
    let output = process_stream(&input);
    assert_eq!(output, expected);
}

/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a comma.
///
/// The comma following the inline code span should remain on the same line
/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
#[test]
fn test_wrap_list_item_comma_after_code() {
    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_comma_input.txt");
    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_comma_expected.txt");
    let output = process_stream(&input);
    assert_eq!(output, expected);
}

/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a colon.
///
/// The colon following the inline code span should remain on the same line
/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
#[test]
fn test_wrap_list_item_colon_after_code() {
    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_colon_input.txt");
    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_colon_expected.txt");
    let output = process_stream(&input);
    assert_eq!(output, expected);
}

/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a semicolon.
///
/// The semicolon following the inline code span should remain on the same line
/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
#[test]
fn test_wrap_list_item_semicolon_after_code() {
    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_semicolon_input.txt");
    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_semicolon_expected.txt");
    let output = process_stream(&input);
    assert_eq!(output, expected);
}

```

You will need to add the corresponding test data files:
- `data/bullet_question_mark_input.txt` and `data/bullet_question_mark_expected.txt`
- `data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt` and `data/bullet_exclamation_mark_expected.txt`
- `data/bullet_comma_input.txt` and `data/bullet_comma_expected.txt`
- `data/bullet_colon_input.txt` and `data/bullet_colon_expected.txt`
- `data/bullet_semicolon_input.txt` and `data/bullet_semicolon_expected.txt`

Each input file should contain a list item with an inline code span followed by the respective punctuation mark, and each expected file should contain the correctly wrapped output.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Comment thread tests/wrap.rs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

♻️ Duplicate comments (9)
tests/data/bullet_question_mark_input.txt (1)

2-4: Same wording issue as earlier file

Apply the wording tweak suggested for bullet_colon_expected.txt to maintain consistency across all test-data snippets.

tests/data/bullet_comma_input.txt (1)

2-4: Same wording issue as earlier file

Apply the wording tweak suggested for bullet_colon_expected.txt to maintain consistency across all test-data snippets.

tests/data/bullet_comma_expected.txt (1)

2-4: Same wording issue as earlier file

Apply the wording tweak suggested for bullet_colon_expected.txt to maintain consistency across all test-data snippets.

tests/data/bullet_semicolon_input.txt (1)

2-4: Same wording issue as earlier file

Apply the wording tweak suggested for bullet_colon_expected.txt to maintain consistency across all test-data snippets.

tests/data/bullet_question_mark_expected.txt (1)

3-3: Same stray “10” artefact as noted earlier
Issue and fix identical to the previous file.

tests/data/bullet_colon_input.txt (1)

3-3: Same stray “10” artefact as noted earlier
Issue and fix identical to the previous file.

tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_expected.txt (1)

3-3: Same stray “10” artefact as noted earlier
Issue and fix identical to the previous file.

tests/data/bullet_semicolon_expected.txt (1)

3-3: Same stray “10” artefact as noted earlier
Issue and fix identical to the previous file.

tests/wrap.rs (1)

478-548: Consolidate duplicated tests using parameterised testing.

These regression tests correctly implement the previous feedback and provide comprehensive coverage for all punctuation marks. However, the identical structure creates significant code duplication that violates DRY principles.

Replace the six individual tests with a single parameterised test:

-/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a full stop.
-///
-/// The period following the inline code span should remain on the same line
-/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
-#[test]
-fn test_wrap_list_item_period_after_code() {
-    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_full_stop_input.txt");
-    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_full_stop_expected.txt");
-    let output = process_stream(&input);
-    assert_eq!(output, expected);
-}
-
-/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a question mark.
-///
-/// The question mark following the inline code span should remain on the same line
-/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
-#[test]
-fn test_wrap_list_item_question_mark_after_code() {
-    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_question_mark_input.txt");
-    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_question_mark_expected.txt");
-    let output = process_stream(&input);
-    assert_eq!(output, expected);
-}
-
-/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with an exclamation mark.
-///
-/// The exclamation mark following the inline code span should remain on the same line
-/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
-#[test]
-fn test_wrap_list_item_exclamation_mark_after_code() {
-    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt");
-    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_exclamation_mark_expected.txt");
-    let output = process_stream(&input);
-    assert_eq!(output, expected);
-}
-
-/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a comma.
-///
-/// The comma following the inline code span should remain on the same line
-/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
-#[test]
-fn test_wrap_list_item_comma_after_code() {
-    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_comma_input.txt");
-    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_comma_expected.txt");
-    let output = process_stream(&input);
-    assert_eq!(output, expected);
-}
-
-/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a colon.
-///
-/// The colon following the inline code span should remain on the same line
-/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
-#[test]
-fn test_wrap_list_item_colon_after_code() {
-    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_colon_input.txt");
-    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_colon_expected.txt");
-    let output = process_stream(&input);
-    assert_eq!(output, expected);
-}
-
-/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with a semicolon.
-///
-/// The semicolon following the inline code span should remain on the same line
-/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
-#[test]
-fn test_wrap_list_item_semicolon_after_code() {
-    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_semicolon_input.txt");
-    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!("data/bullet_semicolon_expected.txt");
-    let output = process_stream(&input);
-    assert_eq!(output, expected);
-}
+/// Regression test for wrapping list items that end with punctuation after code.
+///
+/// Punctuation following inline code spans should remain on the same line
+/// as the code block rather than being wrapped onto a new indented line.
+#[rstest]
+#[case("full_stop", "period")]
+#[case("question_mark", "question mark")]
+#[case("exclamation_mark", "exclamation mark")]
+#[case("comma", "comma")]
+#[case("colon", "colon")]
+#[case("semicolon", "semicolon")]
+fn test_wrap_list_item_punctuation_after_code(
+    #[case] file_suffix: &str,
+    #[case] punctuation_name: &str,
+) {
+    let input: Vec<String> = include_lines!(&format!("data/bullet_{file_suffix}_input.txt"));
+    let expected: Vec<String> = include_lines!(&format!("data/bullet_{file_suffix}_expected.txt"));
+    let output = process_stream(&input);
+    assert_eq!(output, expected, "Failed to wrap list item with {punctuation_name} after code");
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 096ddc9 and dcce5e2.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • tests/data/bullet_colon_expected.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_colon_input.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_comma_expected.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_comma_input.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_expected.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_question_mark_expected.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_question_mark_input.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_semicolon_expected.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/bullet_semicolon_input.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/wrap.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Comments must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar.
Function documentation must include clear examples.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.
Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Use concat!() to combine long string literals rather than escaping newlines with a backslash.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, or complexity. Don't echo the obvious.
Use functions and composition. Avoid repetition by extracting reusable logic. Prefer generators or comprehensions, and declarative code to imperative repetition when readable.
Small, meaningful functions. Functions must be small, clear in purpose, single responsibility, and obey command/query segregation.
Name things precisely. Use clear, descriptive variable and function names. For booleans, prefer names with is, has, or should.
Structure log...

Files:

  • tests/wrap.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/wrap.rs
🧠 Learnings (10)
tests/data/bullet_colon_expected.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_colon_input.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_semicolon_expected.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_semicolon_input.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_question_mark_expected.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_comma_expected.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_expected.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_question_mark_input.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

tests/data/bullet_comma_input.txt (1)

Learnt from: CR
PR: leynos/lille#0
File: docs/bevy-headless-testing.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T12:03:04.107Z
Learning: Applies to docs/**/*.{rs} : Use StateScoped(MyState::Variant) components to ensure entities are automatically despawned when exiting a state, improving test cleanup

🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/wrap.rs (1)
src/process.rs (1)
  • process_stream (206-214)
🪛 LanguageTool
tests/data/bullet_colon_expected.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_colon_input.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_semicolon_expected.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_semicolon_input.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_question_mark_expected.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_comma_expected.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_expected.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_question_mark_input.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

tests/data/bullet_comma_input.txt

[typographical] ~1-~1: Consider using an em dash in dialogues and enumerations.
Context: - StateScoped Entities: A best practi...

(DASH_RULE)


[style] ~1-~1: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...practice for managing entity lifecycles in conjunction with states is the use of `StateScoped(MySta...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 240000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-test

Comment thread tests/data/bullet_colon_expected.txt
Comment thread tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt
Comment thread tests/data/bullet_exclamation_mark_input.txt
@leynos leynos merged commit 393b4a6 into main Jul 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@leynos leynos deleted the codex/add-test-for-bullet-point-line-wrapping branch July 29, 2025 23:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant