Skip to content

Improve Token docs and test diagnostics#181

Merged
leynos merged 5 commits intomainfrom
lac9g7-codex/add-detailed-assertion-messages-in-tests
Aug 4, 2025
Merged

Improve Token docs and test diagnostics#181
leynos merged 5 commits intomainfrom
lac9g7-codex/add-detailed-assertion-messages-in-tests

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Aug 4, 2025

Summary

  • clarify Token's purpose and lifetime parameter
  • add detailed mismatch message in wrap renumbering test

Testing

  • make fmt
  • make lint (fails: error[E0658]: let expressions in this position are unstable)
  • make test (fails: error[E0658]: let expressions in this position are unstable)

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_688ffa9ebe2c832295b62ee182f46073

Summary by Sourcery

Improve documentation for Token by explaining its lifetime linkage to source text and enhance wrap renumbering tests with custom assertion messages

Enhancements:

  • Clarify Token<'a>' purpose and lifetime parameter in documentation
  • Enhance wrap_renumber_preserves_order test to include detailed mismatch diagnostics

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR enriches Token’s documentation by elaborating on its lifetime parameter and refactors the is_fence function for consistency, and enhances the wrap-renumbering test by replacing the plain assert with a detailed mismatch message.

Class diagram for Token documentation update

classDiagram
    class Token {
        <<lifetime 'a>>
        +fields tied to source text
        +used for custom wrapping logic
    }
    %% The diagram highlights the lifetime parameter and its purpose as clarified in the documentation.
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Clarify Token docs and adjust formatting of wrap.rs
  • Extended doc comments to explain the 'a lifetime and its purpose
  • Converted single-line is_fence definition into a block for readability
src/wrap.rs
Improve wrap_renumber test diagnostics
  • Replaced simple assert_eq! with one that prints both expected and actual on failure
  • Added custom mismatch message showing debug representations of outputs
tests/wrap_renumber.rs

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved documentation for the re-exported token type and the function that detects fence markers in text.
  • Tests
    • Enhanced test assertions with clearer error messages for easier debugging.
  • Refactor
    • Refactored logic in the function that checks for strong tags in HTML to improve code clarity.

Walkthrough

Document the re-exported Token<'a> type in src/wrap.rs with a comprehensive doc comment, clarifying its usage and lifetime. Reformat the is_fence function from a single-line to a multi-line block without altering its logic. Enhance a test assertion in tests/wrap_renumber.rs to provide clearer failure messages. Refactor the contains_strong function in src/html.rs for improved readability by separating pattern matching and conditional checks.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Token Documentation & Fence Function Formatting
src/wrap.rs
Add a detailed doc comment to the Token<'a> re-export. Add doc comment to is_fence. Reformat is_fence to a multi-line block, maintaining logic.
Enhanced Test Assertion
tests/wrap_renumber.rs
Update test assertion to output a detailed custom error message on failure for better diagnostics.
Function Refactoring for Readability
src/html.rs
Refactor contains_strong to separate pattern matching and tag checks for clarity; no logic change.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Not applicable; no new features or control flow changes introduced.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In wrap.rs, a comment grew,
Explaining tokens, fresh and new.
The fence now stands on lines apart,
While tests reveal their beating heart.
With docs and messages clear and bright,
Code reviews will be light!
🦀✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f906919 and fc22bbc.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/html.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/wrap.rs (2 hunks)
  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Use concat!() to combine long string literals rather than escaping newlines with a backslash.
Prefer semantic error enums: Derive std::error::Error (via the thiserror crate) for any condition the caller might inspect, retry, or map to an HTTP status.
Use an opaque error only at the app boundary: Use eyre::Report for human-readable logs; these should not be exposed in public APIs.
Never export the opaque type from a library: Convert to domain enums at API boundaries, and to eyre only in the main main() entrypoint or top-level async task.

Files:

  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs
  • src/wrap.rs
  • src/html.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs
  • src/wrap.rs
  • src/html.rs
🪛 GitHub Check: build-test
src/html.rs

[failure] 115-115:
this if statement can be collapsed

🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
src/html.rs

[error] 115-115: Clippy lint error: this if statement can be collapsed.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/wrap.rs (2)

18-21: Excellent documentation for the Token type.

The doc comment clearly explains the purpose of downstream inspection and the rationale for the lifetime parameter. This addresses the PR objective of clarifying the Token type's purpose and lifetime linkage to source text.


170-170: Well-documented fence detection function.

The doc comment succinctly explains the function's purpose and behaviour. The #[rustfmt::skip] attribute appropriately preserves the single-line format as required by the coding guidelines.

Also applies to: 172-172

tests/wrap_renumber.rs (1)

16-19: Enhanced test diagnostics improve debugging.

The detailed mismatch message with debug formatting will significantly improve failure analysis by clearly showing both expected and actual values. This directly addresses the PR objective of enhancing test diagnostics.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch lac9g7-codex/add-detailed-assertion-messages-in-tests

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • The new assert_eq! macro usage relies on unstable let expressions and is causing compilation failures—consider rewriting the custom message syntax so it compiles on stable Rust.
  • The formatting-only expansion of the is_fence function doesn’t add any semantic value and diverges from similar one-liners; consider reverting it or applying the same style across all small utility functions.
  • You can simplify the custom assertion by dropping the redundant named parameters and using the placeholders ({expected:?} and {out:?}) directly in the format string.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The new `assert_eq!` macro usage relies on unstable `let` expressions and is causing compilation failures—consider rewriting the custom message syntax so it compiles on stable Rust.
- The formatting-only expansion of the `is_fence` function doesn’t add any semantic value and diverges from similar one-liners; consider reverting it or applying the same style across all small utility functions.
- You can simplify the custom assertion by dropping the redundant named parameters and using the placeholders (`{expected:?}` and `{out:?}`) directly in the format string.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `src/wrap.rs:171` </location>
<code_context>

 #[doc(hidden)]
-pub fn is_fence(line: &str) -> bool { FENCE_RE.is_match(line) }
+pub fn is_fence(line: &str) -> bool {
+    FENCE_RE.is_match(line)
+}
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
The function `is_fence` was previously a single-line function and did not require a block; the change introduces unnecessary verbosity.

Since `is_fence` is a simple wrapper, it can remain a single-line function without braces or an explicit `return`. Please revert to the concise form unless you plan to add more logic.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Comment thread src/wrap.rs Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cb798a and 0e7c129.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/wrap.rs (2 hunks)
  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Use concat!() to combine long string literals rather than escaping newlines with a backslash.
Prefer semantic error enums: Derive std::error::Error (via the thiserror crate) for any condition the caller might inspect, retry, or map to an HTTP status.
Use an opaque error only at the app boundary: Use eyre::Report for human-readable logs; these should not be exposed in public APIs.
Never export the opaque type from a library: Convert to domain enums at API boundaries, and to eyre only in the main main() entrypoint or top-level async task.

Files:

  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs
  • src/wrap.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs
  • src/wrap.rs
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
src/wrap.rs

[warning] 168-170: Prettier formatting check failed. Diff detected in function formatting. Run 'cargo fmt --all' to fix code style issues.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/wrap.rs (1)

18-21: Improve! Public-facing docs now clearly explain the purpose of 'a.

The added explanation makes the token’s lifetime requirements explicit and removes any ambiguity for downstream users. Good job.

tests/wrap_renumber.rs (1)

16-22: Swap the arguments in assert_eq! so the error message aligns with macro output.

assert_eq!(left, right, …) prints left as “left” and right as “right”.
Currently out is left but the custom message labels it “actual”. Reverse the operands to keep diagnostics consistent and remove the redundant named arguments.

-assert_eq!(
-    out,
-    expected,
-    "renumbered output mismatch:\nexpected: {expected:?}\nactual: {out:?}",
-    expected = expected,
-    out = out,
-);
+assert_eq!(
+    expected,
+    out,
+    "renumbered output mismatch:\nexpected: {expected:?}\nactual: {out:?}"
+);

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

Comment thread src/wrap.rs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e7c129 and f04e207.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/html.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/wrap.rs (2 hunks)
  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Use concat!() to combine long string literals rather than escaping newlines with a backslash.
Prefer semantic error enums: Derive std::error::Error (via the thiserror crate) for any condition the caller might inspect, retry, or map to an HTTP status.
Use an opaque error only at the app boundary: Use eyre::Report for human-readable logs; these should not be exposed in public APIs.
Never export the opaque type from a library: Convert to domain enums at API boundaries, and to eyre only in the main main() entrypoint or top-level async task.

Files:

  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs
  • src/html.rs
  • src/wrap.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/wrap_renumber.rs
  • src/html.rs
  • src/wrap.rs
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/html.rs (1)

87-89: Revert to single-line format.

This simple boolean expression doesn't require multi-line formatting. The coding guidelines state "Do not use return in single-line functions" - keep this as a concise single-line function.

-fn is_table_cell(handle: &Handle) -> bool {
-    is_element(handle, "td") || is_element(handle, "th")
-}
+fn is_table_cell(handle: &Handle) -> bool { is_element(handle, "td") || is_element(handle, "th") }

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

src/wrap.rs (2)

18-21: Excellent documentation improvement.

The detailed doc comment clearly explains the Token<'a> type's purpose and the significance of the lifetime parameter. This addresses the coding guideline requirement to document public APIs with Rustdoc comments.


170-173: Documentation and formatting are now correct.

The function has proper documentation explaining its purpose, the #[doc(hidden)] attribute is correctly placed after the doc comment, and the function maintains single-line format as required by the coding guidelines.

tests/wrap_renumber.rs (1)

16-19: Excellent test diagnostic improvement.

Enhanced assertion message provides clear debugging information showing expected vs actual output when the test fails. This improvement aids in troubleshooting without affecting test logic.

Comment thread src/html.rs Outdated
@leynos leynos force-pushed the lac9g7-codex/add-detailed-assertion-messages-in-tests branch from f906919 to fc22bbc Compare August 4, 2025 22:50
@leynos leynos merged commit 0e613ac into main Aug 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@leynos leynos deleted the lac9g7-codex/add-detailed-assertion-messages-in-tests branch August 4, 2025 23:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant