Skip to content

Fix link wrapping#99

Merged
leynos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/modify-reflow-algorithm-to-preserve-links
Jul 20, 2025
Merged

Fix link wrapping#99
leynos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/modify-reflow-algorithm-to-preserve-links

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Jul 19, 2025

Summary

  • treat Markdown links as indivisible tokens during wrapping
  • ensure README code blocks specify languages
  • verify link wrapping behaviour

Testing

  • make fmt
  • make lint
  • make test
  • make markdownlint
  • make nixie

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_687b82f6823c83229077f87bc83e5260

Summary by Sourcery

Improve paragraph wrapping by treating Markdown links as atomic tokens and ensure proper link wrapping behavior, while updating README code fences with language annotations and reflowing long lines.

Enhancements:

  • Treat Markdown links (and images) as indivisible tokens during paragraph wrapping
  • Add a test to ensure that links are not split across lines when wrapping

Documentation:

  • Specify languages on all code fences in the README
  • Reflow long lines in the README to adhere to 80-column wrapping

Tests:

  • Add a test case to verify link wrapping behaviour

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jul 19, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Enhance wrapping logic to treat Markdown links as indivisible tokens, update README code blocks with language annotations and consistent wrapping, and add a test to verify link wrapping behavior.

Class diagram for updated Markdown wrapping logic

classDiagram
    class Wrap {
        +tokenize_inline(text: &str) -> Vec<String>
    }

    class tokenize_inline {
        +Handles Markdown links as indivisible tokens
        +Handles images (e.g., ![alt](url)) as indivisible tokens
        +Handles code spans as indivisible tokens
        +Handles hyphenated words as indivisible tokens
    }

    Wrap --> tokenize_inline : uses
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Recognize Markdown links as single tokens during wrapping
  • Added branch in tokenize_inline to detect '[' and '![' sequences
  • Implemented depth-aware parsing of parentheses for link URLs
  • Ensured full link syntax is captured as one token
src/wrap.rs
Specify code block languages and adjust manual wrapping in README
  • Updated all fenced code blocks to include language identifiers (bash, markdown, rust)
  • Reflowed README paragraphs and list items to 80 columns
  • Preserved escaped pipes and formatting in descriptive text
README.md
Add test to verify links aren’t split across wrapped lines
  • Introduced test_wrap_paragraph_with_link in wrap.rs tests
  • Assert that markdown link remains intact in output
tests/wrap.rs

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 19, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@leynos has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9790ec7 and 32ad5f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/wrap.rs (2 hunks)
  • tests/wrap.rs (1 hunks)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of Markdown links and images to ensure they are not split across lines during paragraph wrapping.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test to verify that Markdown links remain intact when text is wrapped.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced README formatting for improved readability and consistency.

Walkthrough

Extend the inline tokeniser to recognise and handle Markdown links and images as atomic tokens, preventing them from being split during text wrapping. Add a test to verify that links remain unbroken after wrapping. Reformat the README for improved readability, adjusting line breaks and code block annotations without altering content.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md Reformatted text for readability; adjusted line wrapping and code block language annotations.
src/wrap.rs Extended tokenize_inline to detect and tokenise Markdown links and images as single tokens.
tests/wrap.rs Added test to ensure Markdown links are not split by the paragraph wrapper.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Wrapper
    participant Tokenizer

    User->>Wrapper: Request to wrap paragraph with Markdown link/image
    Wrapper->>Tokenizer: Tokenise paragraph content
    Tokenizer->>Tokenizer: Detect link/image pattern ([...](...)/![...](...))
    Tokenizer-->>Wrapper: Return tokens (links/images as atomic)
    Wrapper-->>User: Return wrapped paragraph (links/images unbroken)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Wrap the links, keep them whole,
Markdown magic, that’s the goal!
Images too, now safe and snug,
No more splits—just one big hug.
Readme neat, the code refined,
A tidy world for all mankind!
🖇️✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/modify-reflow-algorithm-to-preserve-links

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.

  • Consider extracting the new link‐tokenization logic into its own helper function to improve readability and isolate complexity.
  • It might be worth adding tests for image links (![alt](url)) and other edge cases (e.g. missing or nested parentheses) to ensure the tokenizer handles them correctly.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- Consider extracting the new link‐tokenization logic into its own helper function to improve readability and isolate complexity.
- It might be worth adding tests for image links (`![alt](url)`) and other edge cases (e.g. missing or nested parentheses) to ensure the tokenizer handles them correctly.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `src/wrap.rs:75` </location>
<code_context>
                 tokens.push(chars[start..end].iter().collect());
                 i = end;
             }
+        } else if c == '[' || (c == '!' && i + 1 < chars.len() && chars[i + 1] == '[') {
+            let start = i;
+            if c == '!' {
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
Consider extracting the link and image parsing logic into a separate function to keep the main loop flat and readable.

Consider extracting the new link/image logic into its own function so the main loop stays flat and readable:

```rust
fn parse_link_or_image(chars: &[char], mut i: usize) -> (String, usize) {
    let start = i;
    // optional '!' prefix
    if chars[i] == '!' { i += 1; }
    // opening '['
    i += 1; 
    // find closing ']'
    while i < chars.len() && chars[i] != ']' { i += 1; }
    if i < chars.len() && chars[i] == ']' {
        i += 1;
        // expect '('
        if i < chars.len() && chars[i] == '(' {
            i += 1;
            // balance nested parens
            let mut depth = 1;
            while i < chars.len() && depth > 0 {
                match chars[i] {
                    '(' => depth += 1,
                    ')' => depth -= 1,
                    _   => {}
                }
                i += 1;
            }
            // return the whole slice and new index
            let tok: String = chars[start..i].iter().collect();
            return (tok, i);
        }
    }
    // fallback: just one char
    let tok: String = chars[start..start+1].iter().collect();
    (tok, start + 1)
}
```

Then in `tokenize_inline` replace the big if-nest with:

```rust
} else if c == '[' || (c == '!' && i + 1 < chars.len() && chars[i+1] == '[') {
    let (tok, new_i) = parse_link_or_image(&chars, i);
    tokens.push(tok);
    i = new_i;
    continue;
} else {
    // ...
}
```

This keeps identical behavior but dramatically reduces nesting in your main loop.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Comment thread src/wrap.rs
tokens.push(chars[start..end].iter().collect());
i = end;
}
} else if c == '[' || (c == '!' && i + 1 < chars.len() && chars[i + 1] == '[') {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (complexity): Consider extracting the link and image parsing logic into a separate function to keep the main loop flat and readable.

Consider extracting the new link/image logic into its own function so the main loop stays flat and readable:

fn parse_link_or_image(chars: &[char], mut i: usize) -> (String, usize) {
    let start = i;
    // optional '!' prefix
    if chars[i] == '!' { i += 1; }
    // opening '['
    i += 1; 
    // find closing ']'
    while i < chars.len() && chars[i] != ']' { i += 1; }
    if i < chars.len() && chars[i] == ']' {
        i += 1;
        // expect '('
        if i < chars.len() && chars[i] == '(' {
            i += 1;
            // balance nested parens
            let mut depth = 1;
            while i < chars.len() && depth > 0 {
                match chars[i] {
                    '(' => depth += 1,
                    ')' => depth -= 1,
                    _   => {}
                }
                i += 1;
            }
            // return the whole slice and new index
            let tok: String = chars[start..i].iter().collect();
            return (tok, i);
        }
    }
    // fallback: just one char
    let tok: String = chars[start..start+1].iter().collect();
    (tok, start + 1)
}

Then in tokenize_inline replace the big if-nest with:

} else if c == '[' || (c == '!' && i + 1 < chars.len() && chars[i+1] == '[') {
    let (tok, new_i) = parse_link_or_image(&chars, i);
    tokens.push(tok);
    i = new_i;
    continue;
} else {
    // ...
}

This keeps identical behavior but dramatically reduces nesting in your main loop.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36c8853 and 9790ec7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (6 hunks)
  • src/wrap.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/wrap.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.rs

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENTS.md

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.md

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENTS.md

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/wrap.rs (1)
src/process.rs (1)
  • process_stream (81-81)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~49-~49: Would you like to use the Oxford spelling “standardize”? The spelling ‘standardise’ is also correct.
Context: ...indentation level. - Use --breaks to standardise thematic breaks to a line of 70 undersc...

(OXFORD_SPELLING_Z_NOT_S)


[style] ~52-~52: Consider using the typographical ellipsis character here instead.
Context: ...ipsis to replace groups of three dots (...) with the ellipsis character (…`). ...

(ELLIPSIS)


[style] ~58-~58: You have used the passive voice repeatedly in nearby sentences. To make your writing clearer and easier to read, consider using active voice.
Context: ...ed, input is read from stdin and output is written to stdout. ### Example: Table Reflow...

(REP_PASSIVE_VOICE)


[style] ~121-~121: Since ownership is already implied, this phrasing may be redundant.
Context: ...for embedding the table reflow logic in your own Rust project: Rust ```rust use mdtabl...

(PRP_OWN)


[style] ~152-~152: Would you like to use the Oxford spelling “recognizes”? The spelling ‘recognises’ is also correct.
Context: ...e. ## HTML table support mdtablefix recognises basic HTML <table> elements embedded ...

(OXFORD_SPELLING_Z_NOT_S)


[style] ~154-~154: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...sing stage using convert_html_tables, prior to reflow. Only simple tables composed of...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)


[locale-violation] ~172-~172: License must be spelled with a “c” when used as a noun in British English. Use “licence”.
Context: ...th-rstest-fixtures.md) for details. ## License This project is licensed under the ISC...

(LICENCE_LICENSE_NOUN_SINGULAR)


[locale-violation] ~174-~174: License must be spelled with a “c” when used as a noun in British English. Use “licence”.
Context: ... This project is licensed under the ISC License. See the LICENSE file for fu...

(LICENCE_LICENSE_NOUN_SINGULAR)


[locale-violation] ~174-~174: LICENSE must be spelled with a “c” when used as a noun in British English. Use “licence”.
Context: ...icensed under the ISC License. See the LICENSE file for full details.

(LICENCE_LICENSE_NOUN_SINGULAR)

🔇 Additional comments (14)
README.md (12)

3-5: LGTM! Proper paragraph wrapping applied.

The text has been correctly wrapped to 80 columns whilst preserving the original meaning and improving readability.


7-10: Formatting improvement maintained.

The paragraph wrapping enhances readability whilst keeping the content intact.


18-18: Correct code block language annotation added.

The bash annotation improves syntax highlighting and follows the coding guidelines.


26-26: Consistent language annotation applied.

The bash annotation maintains consistency with other code blocks in the document.


34-34: Language annotation correctly applied.


38-59: Proper formatting applied to command-line options.

The bullet points are correctly wrapped to 80 columns, improving readability whilst preserving all content. The use of "standardise" follows British English spelling conventions as required by the coding guidelines.


67-67: Markdown code block properly annotated.


77-77: Consistent markdown annotation applied.


91-117: Example formatting improved with proper annotations.

The markdown code blocks are correctly annotated and the content is preserved whilst improving readability.


121-149: Library usage section properly formatted.

The text wrapping and rust code block annotation improve readability whilst maintaining all essential information.


152-159: HTML table support section correctly formatted.

The text wrapping improves readability. The use of "recognises" follows British English spelling conventions as required.


164-170: Section formatting improved.

The text wrapping enhances readability whilst preserving content.

src/wrap.rs (1)

75-104: Robust link tokenization logic implemented.

The implementation correctly handles inline Markdown links and images as atomic tokens, preventing them from being split during wrapping. The logic appropriately:

  • Detects both link [text](url) and image ![alt](url) syntax
  • Uses balanced parentheses tracking to handle nested parentheses in URLs
  • Falls back gracefully to single-character tokenization for incomplete patterns

This addresses the PR objective effectively. Note that reference-style links [text][ref] and autolinks <url> are not handled, but these are separate patterns that could be added in future iterations if needed.

tests/wrap.rs (1)

428-444: Effective test for link preservation implemented.

The test correctly validates that Markdown links remain unbroken during paragraph wrapping. The realistic example and specific assertion provide good coverage for the new tokenization functionality and establish regression protection.

Comment thread README.md
@leynos leynos merged commit a27f2bd into main Jul 20, 2025
2 checks passed
@leynos leynos deleted the codex/modify-reflow-algorithm-to-preserve-links branch July 20, 2025 03:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant