Conversation
Reviewer's GuideUpdates documentation to reflect ongoing PostgreSQL backend support: adds build instructions for the postgres feature, marks support as in progress in the roadmap, and appends a progress note in the README. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThis update revises documentation to clarify the status of PostgreSQL backend support. It adds a note in the README about ongoing development, marks PostgreSQL as "in progress" in the roadmap, and provides explicit build instructions for enabling PostgreSQL support using a feature flag. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Quality Gate Profile: Pay Down Tech Debt
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
README.md (1)
32-32: Use a note prefix for clarity
Consider prefixing this line with “Note:” and specifying “backend” to align with the existing documentation tone. For example:- PostgreSQL support is currently in progress. + **Note**: PostgreSQL backend support is currently a work in progress.docs/roadmap.md (1)
62-64: Standardise checklist status formatting
The italic markup around in progress is unnecessary; parentheses suffice. For consistency, update to:- - [ ] PostgreSQL backend support *(in progress)* + - [ ] PostgreSQL backend support (in progress)docs/supporting-both-sqlite3-and-postgresql-in-diesel.md (1)
3-7: Provide symmetry with SQLite instructions
Since you’ve added build steps for PostgreSQL, consider including the analogous SQLite command (or explicitly scope this snippet to PostgreSQL only). For example:Build the application with PostgreSQL support enabled: ```bash cargo build --features postgres+Build the application with SQLite support enabled:
+
+bash +cargo build --features sqlite +</blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 255e8a52eb6fabc93ef654db0bf01c8f692b4a47 and 81456b8af4a6ae686c9c2b0986aacebdb8f2467c. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (3)</summary> * `README.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/roadmap.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/supporting-both-sqlite3-and-postgresql-in-diesel.md` (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)</summary> * GitHub Check: coverage </details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
- Standardize the capitalization of “PostgreSQL” (e.g. in the Diesel doc title and headings) for consistency.
- Consider adding a symmetric example for building with
--features sqliteto mirror the PostgreSQL instructions and reinforce that exactly one feature must be enabled. - Include a note or link on how to run migrations when using the
postgresfeature so users know the next steps after building.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Quality Gate Profile: Pay Down Tech Debt
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
1 participant
Summary
--features postgresTesting
cargo fmt --allcargo clippy -- -D warningscargo testnpx markdownlint-cli2 '**/*.md' '#**/node_modules'nixie docshttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6849e559180483228fb242182fcbb13d
Summary by Sourcery
Update project documentation to reflect the in-progress PostgreSQL backend and add instructions for enabling it via cargo features.
Documentation:
--features postgres.Summary by CodeRabbit